Fluoride Releasing Potential and Recharging Capacity of Different Bioactive Restorative Materials (A Comparative In-Vitro Study)
| Autor: | Eman Mohamed Sobhy Elbahrawy, Reham M. Attia |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
0303 health sciences
Significant difference Glass ionomer cement Resin modified 030206 dentistry 03 medical and health sciences chemistry.chemical_compound 0302 clinical medicine chemistry Fluoride release In vitro study ACTIVA BioACTIVE-RESTORATIVE Fluoride 030304 developmental biology Nuclear chemistry |
| Zdroj: | Egyptian Dental Journal. 66:1295-1309 |
| ISSN: | 2090-2360 |
| DOI: | 10.21608/edj.2020.25914.1072 |
| Popis: | Aim: This study aimed to asses and compare the fluoride releasing potential and recharging capacity of different bioactive restorative materials in-vitro Materials and Methods: 50 freshly extracted premolar teeth was used. buccal class V cavities were prepared. Sample was randomly divided into 5 main groups (n = 10 /group), representing materials used; Conventional glass ionomer, resin modified glass ionomer, Compomer , Giomer; and ACTIVA Bioactive-Restorative. Fluoride releasing potential and recharging capacity were evaluated at 1st, 3rd,7th, 14th , 21st and 28th days. Results: There was significant difference between each tested materials at all time intervals before and after recharging (p ≤ 0.001). The highest fluoride releasing potential and recharging capacity was in (Day-1), and the least value was in (Day-28). There was significant difference between the tested materials at each time interval regarding fluoride release before and after recharge.; Conventional glass ionomer showed the highest values of fluoride releasing potential and recharging capacity at each time interval (1st, 3rd,7th, 14th , 21st and 28th days.), while compomer showed the lowest values at each time interval. Conclusion: The conventional glass ionomer showed the highest fluoride releasing potential and recharging capacity, while compomer showed the lowest fluoride releasing potential and recharging capacity at each time interval. ACTIVIA Bioactive-Restorative showed a lower fluoride releasing potential and fluoride recharging capacity than those of conventional glass ionomer, a higher values than those of both compomers and , resin modified glass ionomer and comparable to those of giomer at each time interval |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|