MO814: Sucroferric Oxyhydroxide versus Calcium Carbonate in the Treatment Bone Metabolism in Patients with Ckd3–5 Evaluated by 18F-NA Fluoride PET/CT and Biomarkers: A Randomized Crossover Study

Autor: Marie Vrist, Ann Mai Hindkjær Østergaard, Frank Mose, Thomas G Lauridsen, Jørn Theil, Claire Fynbo, Bente L Langdahl, Jesper Nørgaard Bech
Rok vydání: 2022
Předmět:
Zdroj: Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. 37
ISSN: 1460-2385
0931-0509
Popis: BACKGROUND AND AIMS Non-invasive methods for assessing bone metabolism have been lacking in chronic kidney disease (CKD), and the effects of different treatments on bone metabolism are mostly unknown. However, fluorine-18 labeled sodium fluoride (18F-NaF) PET/CT scanning can assess bone turnover as skeletal plasma clearance of tracer (Ki) and bone volume/tissue volume (BV/TV) in CKD. In a randomized crossover study, we aimed to compare the 8-week treatment effects of a non-calcium-based phosphate binder, sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SO), with 8 weeks of treatment with a calcium-based phosphate binder, calcium carbonate (CC), on bone turnover and BV/TV. METHOD Whole body 18F-NaF PET/CT scans were performed at the end of the CC and SO treatment periods in each participant. Ki was determined by the single-point Patlak method with semi-population input functions. A recently established CKD-MDB population residual curve was applied. Estimation of BV/TV was made by CT-derived Hounsfield units (HU) in specified volumes of interest. Paired t-tests were used or non-parametric tests (Wilcoxon signed-ranks test) when data were not normally distributed. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 20. RESULTS Ki assessed by the 18F-NaF scan was not significantly different at the lumbar spine (CC: 0.030 ± 0.014 mL min–1 mL–1; SO: 0.031 ± 0.014 mL min–1 mL–1; P = .75) or any other site after short-term treatment with SO or CC. However, HU was significantly higher after CC treatment. CONCLUSION 18F-NaF PET/CT is a practical tool with which to evaluate bone metabolism in CKD. Short-term SO treatment did not affect Ki (turnover) differently than CC treatment, but BV/TV (volume) was significantly lower after SO treatment than after CC treatment.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: