| Popis: |
The current menstrual movement calls for overcoming the cultural stigma associated with menstruation and achieving “menstrual equity” and “period poverty”. The movement seeks to increase awareness of menstruation by rectifying and removing discrimination against those who menstruate and providing greater access to menstrual hygiene products (“MHPs”), particularly for the homeless and those with lower incomes. To achieve these goals, the movement is advocating for the elimination of the “tampon tax” and requiring schools provide MHPs to students for free. There are also lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of the tampon tax. Advocates view these legal changes as instrumental in furthering the goals of equity and access to MHPs underlying the movement. This essay discussions whether these legal changes achieve the movement’s goals and also explores their expressive effects. The essay concludes that the process of demanding these legal changes, and sometimes achieving them, plays a more significant role than the law’s actual operation in reaching the movement’s goals. |
