A Comparison of Directional Atherectomy with Coronary Angioplasty in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease
Autor: | Stephen G. Ellis, Eric J. Topol, Tomoaki Hinohara, Gordon Keeler, Kerry L. Lee, Ferdinand Leya, Cass A. Pinkerton, Spencer B. King, Jeffrey M. Isner, Patrick W. Serruys, Ronald Masden, Lisa G. Berdan, Martin B. Leon, Patrick L. Whitlow, Berthold Höfling, David R. Holmes, Daniel B. Mark, Charles A. Simonton, David O. Williams, Robert M. Califf |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 1993 |
Předmět: | |
Zdroj: | New England Journal of Medicine. 329:221-227 |
ISSN: | 1533-4406 0028-4793 |
DOI: | 10.1056/nejm199307223290401 |
Popis: | Background Directional coronary atherectomy is a new technique of coronary revascularization by which atherosclerotic plaque is excised and retrieved from target lesions. With respect to the rate of restenosis and clinical outcomes, it is not known how this procedure compares with balloon angioplasty, which relies on dilation of the plaque and vessel wall. We compared the rate of restenosis after angioplasty with that after atherectomy. Methods At 35 sites in the United States and Europe, 1012 patients were randomly assigned to either atherectomy (512 patients) or angioplasty (500 patients). The patients underwent coronary angiography at base line and again after six months; the paired angiograms were quantitatively assessed at one laboratory by investigators unaware of the treatment assignments. Results Stenosis was reduced to 50 percent or less more often with atherectomy than with angioplasty (89 percent vs. 80 percent, P |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |