��ultural Heritage of European Civilization as a subject of scientific analysis

Autor: Horobets Ihor, Martynov Andrei
Jazyk: ukrajinština
Rok vydání: 2021
Předmět:
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5733156
Popis: The article highlights existing approaches to the theoretical and methodological comprehension of the problems of researching the cultural heritage of European civilization. The purpose of the article is to analyze the main epistemological trends in the study of European civilization cultural heritage. The methodological basis of the article is a civilization analysis. The scientific novelty of the article is to systematize the conceptual achievements of various scientists who adhere to a civilization approach to the study of European cultural heritage. At the beginning of the nineteenth century, competition between the German-speaking and Slavic cultural areals intensified. M. Danilevsky in classical work ��Russia and Europe�� conceptualized the sociocultural differences between two European worlds. The author emphasized their equivalence in terms of historical development. The scientific approach of O. Shpengler is very original. He proved a pessimistic thesis on the decline of European culture, which is degenerate in civilization in the XX century, a civilization paradigm develops successfully. A. Toynbi, F. Brodel, I. Vallerstain expanded the theoretical and methodological principles of civilization research. These authors showed dialectics of mutual influences of global and local processes. Significant contribution to the methodology of comparative analysis of sociocultural values of civilization was made by the classic of sociological thought Max Weber. He developed a methodology and collected an interesting actual material for comparing the labor ethics of various world religions, which is still an urgent problem of historical social globalistics. The conclusions of the article state that in the early ������ century, the cultural legacy of European civilization became global. Not least this happened due to the long global domination of the British Empire. The Great Britain Exit from the European Union is not so much evidence of ��Twilight Europe��, as evidence of the Duality of the European Anglo-Saxon and Romano-Germanic cultural heritage of European civilization. For the further detailed study deserves the problem of careful development of a methodology for comparative analysis of socio-cultural features of various civilizations. It is also advisable to develop the theoretical principles of historical social globalistics and check them on specific historical and sociological materials. In particular, it concerns the analysis of social mechanisms that provide reproduction in the historical time of certain local civilizations, the pace of their development, the specifics of functioning and development.
{"references":["Afonin, Е., Bandurka, О. & Martynov, А. (2002). Velyka Roztoka (hlobalni problemy suchasnosti: sotsialno-istorychnyi analiz) [Velyka Roztoka (global problems of the present: socio-historical analysis)]. Kyiv, Ukraine.","Bock, G. (2000). Frauen in der europäischen Geschichte. Vom Mittelalter bis zur Gegenwart. München.","Galchinsky, A. (2001). Superechnosti reform: u konteksti tsyvilizatsiinoho protsesu [Contradictions of reforms: in the context of the civilization process]. Kyiv, Ukraine.","Gorbatenko, V. (1999). Stratehiia modernizatsii suspilstva. Ukraina i svit na zlami tysiacholit [Strategy for modernization of society. Ukraine and the world at the turn of the millennium]. Kyiv, Ukraine.","Hopkins, T.K. & Wallerstein, I. (1996). The Age of Transition: Trajectory of the World-System 1945–2025. London.","Kaplan, L. & Kristol, W. (2003). The War over Iraq. Saddam's Tyranny and America's Mission. San Francisco, USA.","Kelle, V. (2000). Kultura v sisteme tsivilizatsionnyih mehanizmov. Sravnitelnoe izuchenie tsivilizatsiy mira [Culture in the system of civilizational mechanisms. Comparative study of world civilizations]. Moscow, Russia.","Kofy, A. (2002). Dialogue against conflict and violence. Global Agenda for Dialogue among Civilizations. Asia and Africa today, 7, 4–6.","Kuleshov, S. (2001). Rossiya v sisteme mirovyih tsivilizatsiy [Russia in the system of world civilizations]. Moscow, Russia.","Levchuk, L.T., Hrytsenko, V.S. & Yefymenko, V.V., et al. (1999). Istoriia svitovoi kultury. Kulturni rehiony [History of the world culture. Cultural regions]. Kyiv, Ukraine.","Maksakovskiy, V. (1999). Istoricheskaya geografiya [Historical geography]. Moscow, Russia.","Nazaretian, A. (2001). Tsivilizatsionnyie krizisy v kontekste Universalnoy istorii [Civilizational crises in the context of Universal History]. Moscow, Russia.","Pavlenko, Yu. (1999). Istoriia svitovoi tsyvilizatsii [History of the world civilization]. Kyiv, Ukraine.","Udovyk, S.L. (2002). Globalizatsiya. Semioticheskie podhody [Globalization. Semiotic Approaches]. Kyiv, Ukraine.","Vasilenko, I. (1999). Dialog tsivilizatsiy: sotsiokulturnye problemy politicheskogo partnerstva [Dialogue of Civilizations: Socio-Cultural Problems of Political Partnership]. Moscow, Russia.","Videyko, M. (2002). Trypilska tsyvilizatsiia [Trypillia civilization]. Kyiv, Ukraine.","Yakovez, Yu. (2001). Globalizatsiya i vzaimodeystvie tsivilizatsiy [Globalization and interaction of civilizations]. Moscow, Russia."]}
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: