| Popis: |
Interactions of trans-[Rh(bpb)(CH3)(H2O)] (1) [bpb=1,2-bis(2-pyridinecarboxamido)benzene] with Lewis bases L afford the respective adducts trans-[Rh(bpb)(CH3)(L)], where L=4-substituted pyridine 4-Xpy (X=H (2), tBu (3), NMe2 (4) CN (5)), PMe2Ph (6) or benzimidazole (7). The structures of complexes 3 and 6 have been established by X-ray crystallography. The Rh–C distance in complex 6 (2.095(6) A) is longer than that in complex 3 (2.02(1) A), indicating that PMe2Ph has a stronger trans influence than 4-tBupy. The metal–carbon stretching frequencies for trans-[Rh(bpb)(CH3)(L)] and [M(TTP)(CH3)] [TTP=5,10,15,20-tetrakis(4-methylphenyl)porphyrin dianion; M=Rh, Ir, Ga, In] have been determined by near IR FT-Raman spectroscopy. Complex 1 exhibits ν(Rh–C) at 562 cm−1, which downshifts to 532 cm−1 upon deuteriation of the axial methyl group. Replacement of the aquo ligand in complex 1 with nitrogen ligands or phosphine resulted in downshift in ν(Rh–C). The ν(Rh–C) for trans-[Rh(bpb)(CH3)(L)] was found to decrease in the order L: PMe2Ph≫4-Xpy∼BzIm>H2O, consistent the order of trans influence of L. For [M(TTP)(CH3)] (M=Co, Rh, Ir, Ga, or In) the M–C force constant was found to decrease in the orders Ir>Rh>Co and Ga>In, consistent with the trends of metal–carbon bond strength for these metals. For trans-[Rh(bpb)(CH3)(4-Xpy)] and trans-[Rh(TTP)(CH3)(4-Xpy)], the ν(Rh–C) were found to be not very sensitive to the nature of X, suggesting that the electronic factors of the axial pyridine ligand do not have a significant effect on the Rh–C bonds for these rhodium alkyl complexes. |
Full Text from ScienceDirect