Performance of a clinical and imaging-based multivariate model as decision support tool to help save unnecessary surgeries for high-risk breast lesions
Autor: | Firouzeh Arjmandi, Jessica H. Porembka, Dogan Polat, Basak E. Dogan, Venetia R. Sarode, Jennifer G. Schopp, Yin Xi, Deborah Farr |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
0301 basic medicine
Cancer Research medicine.medical_specialty Multivariate statistics medicine.diagnostic_test Radial scar business.industry Lobular carcinoma Atypical lobular hyperplasia Cancer medicine.disease Lesion 03 medical and health sciences 030104 developmental biology 0302 clinical medicine Breast cancer Oncology 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Biopsy medicine Radiology medicine.symptom business |
Zdroj: | Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 185:479-494 |
ISSN: | 1573-7217 0167-6806 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10549-020-05947-1 |
Popis: | To investigate the performance of an imaging and biopsy parameters-based multivariate model in decreasing unnecessary surgeries for high-risk breast lesions. In an IRB-approved study, we retrospectively reviewed all high-risk lesions (HRL) identified at imaging-guided biopsy in our institution between July 1, 2014-July 1, 2017. Lesions were categorized high-risk-I (HR-I = atypical ductal hyperplasia, atypical lobular hyperplasia, lobular carcinoma in situ and atypical papillary lesion) and II (HR-II = Flat epithelial atypia, radial scar, benign papilloma). Patient risk factors, lesion features, detection and biopsy modality, excision and cancer upgrade rates were collected. Reference standard for upgrade was either excision or at least 2-year imaging follow-up. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to develop a multivariate model using HRL type, lesion and biopsy needle size for surgical cancer upgrade with performance assessed using ROC analysis. Of 699 HRL in 652 patients, 525(75%) had reference standard available, and 48/525(9.1%) showed cancer at surgical excision. Excision (84.5% vs 51.1%) and upgrade (17.6%vs1.8%) rates were higher in HR-I compared to HR-II (p |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |