Differential characteristics associated with progression of mitral and aortic regurgitation in patients undergoing kidney transplantation

Autor: M J Kim, D R Kim, J H Lee, J W Seo, I S Cho, K H Huh, G R Hong, J W Ha, C Y Shim
Rok vydání: 2021
Předmět:
Zdroj: European Heart Journal. 42
ISSN: 1522-9645
0195-668X
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.1580
Popis: Background Heart valve regurgitation is common in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). However, there are no data on the fate of mitral regurgitation (MR) and aortic regurgitation (AR) after kidney transplantation (KT). In this study, we sought to investigate regression or progression rates of MR and AR after KT in patients with ESRD. Moreover, we aimed to explore clinical and echocardiographic factors associated with the progression of MR and AR in patients undergoing KT. Methods Among 1,734 patients who underwent KT from 2005 to 2018 at a single tertiary hospital, 674 patients (407 men; mean 48±12 years) who underwent both pre- and post-KT echocardiography were analyzed comprehensively. Pre-KT echocardiography was performed within three months of KT, and post-KT echocardiography was done between 6 months and 24 months after KT. Severities of MR and AR were graded as no/trivial, mild, moderate, and severe according to the current guidelines. Regression was defined if the severity decreased by one or more grades, while progression was defined if the severity increased by one or more grades. Results Figure 1 shows the regression or progression of MR and AR after KT. 78 (11%) patients showed MR regression, but 41 (6%) experienced MR progression. 13 (2%) revealed AR regression, while 23 (4%) presented AR progression. In patients with MR progression, there were more cases of receiving a second KT, having mitral annular calcification, and showing lesser reduction of left atrial volume after KT. Patients with AR progression showed a longer hemodialysis duration, persistent hypertension after KT, and aortic root dilatation. Factors related to the progression of MR and AR showed statistically meaningful predictive values in a stepwise manner (Figure 2) Conclusions In patients undergoing KT, MR and AR may progress in patients with certain distinct characteristics. Different clinical and echocardiographic characteristics before KT, and reduction of hemodynamic loads after KT determine the progression of MR and AR. Further echocardiographic surveillances after KT are needed in patients with clinical and echocardiographic factors for progression of valve regurgitation. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: