A comparative study of open versus closed method of establishment of pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery

Autor:	Karan R. Patel, Adeesh P. Jain, Sarav C. Shah, Purva C. Shah
Rok vydání:	2019
Předmět:	Laparoscopic surgery medicine.medical_specialty medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry medicine.medical_treatment Open surgery Significant difference medicine.disease Surgery Port (medical) Pneumoperitoneum Envelope method Medicine business Laparoscopy Veress needle
Zdroj:	International Surgery Journal. 6:3335
ISSN:	2349-2902 2349-3305
DOI:	10.18203/2349-2902.isj20194075
Popis:	Background: Laparoscopy has overtaken open surgery as the choice of procedure wherever feasible. More than 50% of complications in laparoscopy occur during creation of pneumoperitoneum. In this study, we are comparing open or Hasson's method and closed or vress method of creation of pneumoperitoneum.Methods: This is a prospective comparative parallel randomised control trial conducted at the Department of Surgery, Baroda Medical College and SSG Hospital from November, 2017 to November, 2018. We divided the patients (n=100) into two groups i.e., open method (group O) (n1=50) and closed method (group C) (n2=50) groups using the envelope method of randomisation. We compared the two techniques in terms of time required to complete the procedures and complications (major and minor) associated with creation of pneumoperitoneum.Results: All the patients that participated in this study belonged to the age group of 10-69 years out of which majority were 15-50 years old. In our study, the mean time required to create pneumoperitoneum by closed method (group C) was 9.3 seconds while by open method (group O), it was 7.84 seconds with p value
Databáze:	OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz:	https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::680c412181b02c4ac808615c97f256f4 https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20194075 Zobrazit plný text záznamu