DEVELOPMENT OF A PREDICTION MODEL (NZSPINE) FOR SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE OUTCOME AFTER SPINE SURGERY

Autor: M. Coia Jadresic, J. Baker
Rok vydání: 2023
Zdroj: Orthopaedic Proceedings. :5-5
ISSN: 2049-4416
1358-992X
DOI: 10.1302/1358-992x.2023.3.005
Popis: Numerous prediction tools are available for estimating postoperative risk following spine surgery. External validation studies have shown mixed results. We present the development, validation, and comparative evaluation of novel tool (NZSpine) for modelling risk of complications within 30 days of spine surgery.Data was gathered retrospectively from medical records of patients who underwent spine surgery at Waikato Hospital between January 2019 and December 2020 (n = 488). Variables were selected a priori based on previous evidence and clinical judgement. Postoperative adverse events were classified objectively using the Comprehensive Complication Index. Models were constructed for the occurrence of any complication and significant complications (based on CCI >26). Performance and clinical utility of the novel model was compared against SpineSage (https://depts.washington.edu/spinersk/), an extant online tool which we have shown in unpublished work to be valid in our local population.Overall complication rate was 34%. In the multivariate model, higher age, increased surgical invasiveness and the presence of preoperative anemia were most strongly predictive of any postoperative complication (OR = 1.03, 1.09, 2.1 respectively, p 26) was most strongly associated with the presence of respiratory disease (OR = 2.82, p Internal validation using the bootstrapped models showed the model was robust, with an AUC of 0.73. Using sensitivity analysis, 80% of the model's predictions were correct. By comparison SpineSage had an AUC of 0.71, and in decision curve analysis the novel model showed greater expected benefit at all thresholds of risk.NZSpine is a novel risk assessment tool for patients undergoing acute and elective spine surgery and may help inform clinicians and patients of their prognosis. Use of an objective tool may help to provide uniformity between DHBs when completing the “clinician assessment of risk” section of the national prioritization tool.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: