Comparison of two schedules for administering oral low-dose methotrexate (weekly versus every-other-week) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in remission: A twenty-four-week, single-blind, randomized study
Autor: | César Pacheco-Tena, Jorge Cazarin-Barrientos, Leticia Lino-Pérez, Magdalena Luis, Maria Victoria Goycochea, Rubén Burgos-Vargas, Janitzia Vázquez-Mellado |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 1999 |
Předmět: |
musculoskeletal diseases
medicine.medical_specialty business.industry Visual analogue scale Incidence (epidemiology) Immunology medicine.disease Rheumatology Surgery law.invention Randomized controlled trial law Statistical significance Rheumatoid arthritis Internal medicine Immunology and Allergy Medicine Pharmacology (medical) Methotrexate skin and connective tissue diseases business Adverse effect medicine.drug |
Zdroj: | Arthritis & Rheumatism. 42:2160-2165 |
ISSN: | 1529-0131 0004-3591 |
DOI: | 10.1002/1529-0131(199910)42:10<2160::aid-anr17>3.0.co;2-t |
Popis: | Objective To compare the efficacy of 2 low-dose oral methotrexate (MTX) schedules in maintaining remission in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods Patients with RA were included if they were receiving treatment with weekly MTX for at least 9 months and the RA was in remission (defined by American College of Rheumatology [ACR] criteria) for at least 6 months. Patients were stratified by treatment and randomly assigned to weekly or every-other-weekly (EOW; reducing their monthly dose by half) treatment with MTX. Patients were evaluated by a rheumatologist (blinded to the treatment schedule) at baseline and at 6, 12, and 24 weeks. The evaluations included joint counts, Ritchie Articular Index, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index, physician's and patient's global health assessments, visual analog scale for pain, and incidence of adverse effects. Laboratory evaluations were done at baseline and at week 24. Results Fifty-one patients were included (26 taking weekly MTX, 25 taking EOW MTX). Baseline comparisons showed no differences between the groups. The mean duration of RA was 90% of the patients in both groups continued in remission. Evaluations of disease activity at 6 and 12 weeks showed no between-group differences. EOW MTX patients who experienced relapse were switched back to weekly MTX, and after a few weeks, their RA was again controlled. The incidence of adverse effects was slightly higher in the weekly MTX group, although the difference did not reach statistical significance. The observed laboratory values were very similar for both groups, except for the serum aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels, which decreased in the EOW MTX group and were statistically significant at week 24 (P = 0.04 and P = 0.006, respectively). Conclusion EOW MTX represents a valid therapeutic alternative for a specific subgroup of RA patients, as outlined by the ACR remission criteria. Patients with a short disease duration who were treated early after disease onset with weekly MTX and who achieve sustained remission have a higher probability of success with the EOW MTX schedule. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |