False-Evidence Ploys and Interrogations: Mock Jurors' Perceptions of False-Evidence Ploy Type, Deception, Coercion, and Justification

Autor:	Krista D. Forrest, J B S Bradley Stastny, C B S Keller Batterman, A B S Jennifer Bruns, William Douglas Woody, Sara E. Brady
Rok vydání:	2012
Předmět:	Confession (law) media_common.quotation_subject Coercion Deception Testimonial Psychiatry and Mental health Clinical Psychology Perception Reading (process) Psychology Interrogation Law Social psychology media_common
Zdroj:	Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 30:342-364
ISSN:	0735-3936
DOI:	10.1002/bsl.1999
Popis:	We studied mock jurors' evaluations of police false-evidence ploys across two false-evidence ploy information conditions (true or false confession). Study 1 participants evaluated lists of demeanor, testimonial, and scientific ploys and rated testimonial false-evidence ploys as more coercive than demeanor false-evidence ploys. Participants in the false-confession condition rated false-evidence ploys as more deceptive than did participants in the true-confession condition. Study 2 participants evaluated false-evidence ploy types within interrogation transcripts. Participants rated testimonial false-evidence ploys as more deceptive and coercive than demeanor false-evidence ploys; participants in the true-confession condition rated false-evidence ploys as more justified. Across studies, participants reading realistic transcripts rated false-evidence ploys as more deceptive and coercive. We discuss implications for scholars, attorneys, and interrogators. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Databáze:	OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz:	https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::633e81d141cec2546948f3d5d4859a0d https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.1999 Zobrazit plný text záznamu Plný text ve formátu PDF Plný text ve formátu HTML
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje	K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit.