Stakeholders’ conflicting aims undermine the washback function of a high-stakes test
| Autor: | Qi Luxia |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2005 |
| Předmět: |
060201 languages & linguistics
Linguistics and Language media_common.quotation_subject 05 social sciences 050301 education 06 humanities and the arts Language and Linguistics Test (assessment) 0602 languages and literature Pedagogy English second language Mathematics education Psychology Function (engineering) 0503 education Social Sciences (miscellaneous) media_common |
| Zdroj: | Language Testing. 22:142-173 |
| ISSN: | 1477-0946 0265-5322 |
| DOI: | 10.1191/0265532205lt300oa |
| Popis: | High-stakes tests are often used as agents for change, but ‘attempts to introduce change in the classroom are often not as effective as their designers hoped they would be’ (Wall, 1996: 334). The National Matriculation English Test (NMET) in China is such a case. Apart from its primary function of selecting candidates for institutions of higher education, the NMET was designed specifically to promote changes in ELT (English language teaching) in schools. Unfortunately, it has fallen short of the goal. This study set out to examine the reasons why the NMET failed to bring about the intended changes or washback effects. For this purpose, data were collected through interview and questionnaire from 8 NMET constructors, 6 English inspectors, 388 teachers and 986 students. The results show that the most important reason for the test failing to achieve the intended washback is that its two major functions - the selection function and the function of promoting change - are in many ways in conflict with each other, making it a powerful trigger for teaching to the test but an ineffective agent for changing teaching and learning in the way intended by its constructors and the policymakers. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|