Uncertainty analysis of hydrological modeling in a tropical area using different algorithms
Autor: | Nguyen Hoang Khanh Linh, Steven R. Fassnacht, Ammar Rafiei Emam, Martin Kappas |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2018 |
Předmět: |
Coefficient of determination
Calibration (statistics) 0208 environmental biotechnology Particle swarm optimization 02 engineering and technology 020801 environmental engineering Swat-CUP General Earth and Planetary Sciences Sensitivity (control systems) GLUE Nash–Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficient Algorithm Uncertainty analysis Mathematics |
Zdroj: | Frontiers of Earth Science. 12:661-671 |
ISSN: | 2095-0209 2095-0195 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11707-018-0695-y |
Popis: | Hydrological modeling outputs are subject to uncertainty resulting from different sources of errors (e.g., error in input data, model structure, and model parameters), making quantification of uncertainty in hydrological modeling imperative and meant to improve reliability of modeling results. The uncertainty analysis must solve difficulties in calibration of hydrological models, which further increase in areas with data scarcity. The purpose of this study is to apply four uncertainty analysis algorithms to a semi-distributed hydrological model, quantifying different source of uncertainties (especially parameter uncertainty) and evaluate their performance. In this study, the Soil and Water Assessment Tools (SWAT) eco-hydrological model was implemented for the watershed in the center of Vietnam. The sensitivity of parameters was analyzed, and the model was calibrated. The uncertainty analysis for the hydrological model was conducted based on four algorithms: Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE), Sequential Uncertainty Fitting (SUFI), Parameter Solution method (ParaSol) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). The performance of the algorithms was compared using P-factor and Rfactor, coefficient of determination (R2), the Nash Sutcliffe coefficient of efficiency (NSE) and Percent Bias (PBIAS). The results showed the high performance of SUFI and PSO with P-factor>0.83, R-factor 0.91, NSE>0.89, and 0.18 |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |