Missed Opportunities in the Review and Revision of Clinical Study Reports

Autor:	Stephen A. Bernhardt, Gregory P. Cuppan
Rok vydání:	2012
Předmět:	Engineering Medical education business.industry Communication media_common.quotation_subject General Business Management and Accounting Medical writing Management Clinical study Work (electrical) Document quality Quality (business) Business and International Management business media_common
Zdroj:	Journal of Business and Technical Communication. 26:131-170
ISSN:	1552-4574 1050-6519
DOI:	10.1177/1050651911430624
Popis:	Circulating written drafts and conducting roundtable reviews are two important document-development activities in many work sites. Previous studies suggest that review processes are frustrating for participants and have substantial inefficiencies caused by conflicting participant purposes. This article presents two case studies of the document-review practices for clinical study reports from a large pharmaceutical company, paying particu- lar attention to whether review efforts contributed to improvements in document quality. Findings suggest that document review did not lead to demonstrable improvement in report quality. The authors offer recommen- dations for improving document-review practices.
Databáze:	OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz:	https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::5ed152c1aef712d3d8708eb5a35e0eff https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651911430624 Zobrazit plný text záznamu Plný text ve formátu PDF Plný text ve formátu HTML
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje	K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit.