Step up to the Brain Injury Guidelines league: Adoption of Brain Injury Guidelines at a Level III trauma center, A pilot study
| Autor: | Steffen Pounders, Kelly Burns, Jennifer Haverkamp, Laura Krech, Amy Koestner, Jeffrey C. Gawel, Charles J. Gibson, Mikalah Gribbell, Douglas Kwazneski, Alistair J. Chapman, Justin Hsu, Gaby Iskander |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Traumatic brain injury business.industry education Trauma center 030208 emergency & critical care medicine League Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine medicine.disease 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Emergency medicine Emergency Medicine medicine Surgery Acute care surgery Level iii business 030217 neurology & neurosurgery |
| Zdroj: | Trauma. 24:294-300 |
| ISSN: | 1477-0350 1460-4086 |
| Popis: | Introduction The Brain Injury Guidelines (BIG) direct surgeons to implement risk-stratified treatment plans for patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). BIG categorize patients into one of three severity categories, from lowest to highest risk (BIG 1, BIG 2, and BIG 3). BIG empowers physicians to implement standardized treatment plans that limit unnecessary hospitalizations, repeat imaging, and neurosurgical consultation. These guidelines have been studied in Level I trauma centers, but their clinical application has never been studied in a Level III trauma center. In this pilot study, we sought to determine if the BIG can be implemented in a regional trauma center where patients with less severe brain injuries are locally evaluated and treated. Methods All TBI patients at a Level III trauma center were stratified using the BIG criteria, where BIG 1 and BIG 2 patients were managed locally and BIG 3 patients were transferred to a Level I trauma center. We conducted a retrospective review using the local trauma database and electronic medical records over a 1-year period when BIG were first protocolized. The primary endpoint included deaths, complications, readmissions, and length of stay. Results There were 6 (12.2%) BIG 1, 5 (10.2%) BIG 2, and 38 (77.6%) BIG 3 patients evaluated at the Level III trauma center. All BIG 1 and BIG 2 patients remained at the Level III trauma center, and 33 of the 38 BIG 3 patients were transferred. There were no complications, readmissions, or unexpected transfers within the BIG 1 or BIG 2 patient cohorts. Conclusion The BIG criteria can be successfully implemented in a Level III trauma center. A collaborative transfer agreement with a Level I trauma center reduces unnecessary transfers without negatively affecting patient care. The BIG criteria should be considered for well-developed regional trauma systems. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|