Psychological Safety: A Meta-Analytic Review and Extension
| Autor: | M. Lance Frazier, Ryan Lee Klinger, Stav Fainshmidt, Veselina Vracheva, Amir Pezeshkan |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2016 |
| Předmět: |
Organizational citizenship behavior
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management Quantitative psychological research 05 social sciences Applied psychology Nomological network 050109 social psychology Psychological safety Empirical research Job performance 0502 economics and business 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences Industrial and organizational psychology Psychology Perceived organizational support Social psychology 050203 business & management Applied Psychology |
| Zdroj: | Personnel Psychology. 70:113-165 |
| ISSN: | 0031-5826 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/peps.12183 |
| Popis: | Although psychological safety research has flourished in recent years, and despite the empirical support for the important role of psychological safety in the workplace, several critical questions remain. In order to address these questions, we aggregate theoretical and empirical works, and draw on 136 independent samples representing over 22,000 individuals and nearly 5,000 groups, to conduct a comprehensive meta-analysis on the antecedents and outcomes of psychological safety. We not only present the nomological network of psychological safety but also extend this research in 4 important ways. First, we compare effect sizes to determine the relative effectiveness of antecedents to psychological safety. Second, we examine the extent to which psychological safety influences both task performance and organizational citizenship behaviors over and beyond related concepts such as positive leader relations and work engagement. Third, we examine whether research design characteristics and national culture alter validities within the nomological network, thus promoting a more accurate and contextualized understanding of psychological safety. Finally, we test the homology assumption by comparing the effect sizes of the antecedents and outcomes of psychological safety across individual and group levels of analysis. We conclude with a discussion of the areas in need of future examination. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text