P372 PULMONARY EMBOLISM IN CARDIAC INTENSIVE CARE UNIT–REAL–WORLD EXPERIENCE OF A TERTIARY CENTER

Autor: M Morosato, R Mager, D Morciano, G Ricchetti, A Eustachio, A Margonato, M Slavich
Rok vydání: 2023
Předmět:
Zdroj: European Heart Journal Supplements. 25:D189-D189
ISSN: 1554-2815
1520-765X
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suad111.444
Popis: Introduction Pulmonary thromboembolism represents a therapeutic challenge for patients admitted to cardiology intensive care units, given the variety of clinical presentations and available treatment opportunities. Methods This retrospective, single–center study recruited patients hospitalized in cardiology intensive care units with a diagnosis of pulmonary thromboembolism between April 2010 and May 2022. For each hospitalized patient, Wells and PESI scores were calculated, the location of the PE was identified, and acute PE resolution at discharge was determined. Patients with cardiac arrest (CCA) and/or cardiogenic shock were identified, and RV longitudinal systolic function (TAPSE) and pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (PASP) were studied. Patients were then stratified based on their clinical risk of in–hospital or 30–day mortality (early mortality); acute phase and discharge treatments and patients who developed major bleeding complications were identified. Results A total of 148 patients were recruited, with a median age of 66 years and predominantly male (51.4%). In 6.4% of patients, in–hospital death occurred (from 0% in low–risk patients to 25% in high–risk patients), 12.2% developed cardiogenic shock and/or CCA. 25.0% of patients had an ongoing neoplasm. Systemic thrombolytic therapy and Sonos were the most effective in terms of mortality (p=0.015) and RV function at discharge in high–risk patients, although associated with a high risk of bleeding. Intermediate–low–risk patients treated with reperfusion therapy showed better RV function parameters, although the sample size did not allow for statistical significance. Conclusions The results obtained are in line with those of the literature with regard to epidemiology, total hospital stay, correlation between acute PE and neoplasms, in–hospital death and FU death. Furthermore, Sonos represents an effective alternative to full–dose systemic thrombolysis in high–risk patients who cannot undergo the latter. Finally, in intermediate–low risk patients, there may be a role for reperfusion therapy in selected patients with very low bleeding risk.
Databáze: OpenAIRE