Post-Apartheid South Africa: A Reply to John Saul
| Autor: | Jeremy Cronin |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2002 |
| Předmět: |
Disappointment
History Sociology and Political Science Inequality Betrayal media_common.quotation_subject Geography Planning and Development Empathy Gender studies Management Monitoring Policy and Law Solidarity Gender Studies Race (biology) Feeling medicine medicine.symptom media_common Post apartheid |
| Zdroj: | Monthly Review. 54:28 |
| ISSN: | 0027-0520 |
| DOI: | 10.14452/mr-054-07-2002-11_3 |
| Popis: | John Saul has had an extensive and committed involvement with Southern Africa. His analyses are taken seriously in left circles in South Africa. Sadly, perhaps understandably, his most recent extended visit to this country has left him feeling deeply disappointed ("Cry for the Beloved Country: The Post-Apartheid Denouement," Monthly Review 52, no. 8, January 2001, pp. 1-51). This sense of disappointment is rooted, I would guess, partly in the intellectual, organizational and even emotional energies that Saul, like many others, invested in the solidarity struggle against apartheid, and in legitimate expectations for a post-apartheid South Africa. There is also, and I want to underline my own empathy with his irritation on this score, a hint of personal hurt: "The most startling thing I personally discovered about the New South Africa is just how easy it has become to find oneself considered an ultraleftist!" (p. 1) This sense of disappointment, even of betrayal, is also present in many progressive circles within South Africa, and indeed among many cadres of our movement. Despite all of this there is, I believe, something seriously off-beam in Saul's analysis.This article can also be found at the Monthly Review website, where most recent articles are published in full.Click here to purchase a PDF version of this article at the Monthly Review website. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|