The Effect of In-Class Formality during a Peer-Teaching Activity on Student’s Satisfaction, Perceived Participation and Learning Gain
| Autor: | Sanneke Bolhuis, Sascha van Kuppeveld, Jan G. M. Kooloos, Tim Klaassen, Marc A.T.M. Vorstenbosch |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2016 |
| Předmět: |
Class (computer programming)
020205 medical informatics Wilcoxon signed-rank test education Repeated measures design 02 engineering and technology General Medicine Formality Test (assessment) 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Friedman test 0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineering Learning gain 030212 general & internal medicine Analysis of variance Psychology Social psychology |
| Zdroj: | Creative Education. :1810-1819 |
| ISSN: | 2151-4771 2151-4755 |
| Popis: | Background: It was hypothesized that cooperation would be stimulated in small groups preparing for peer-teaching when the required formality level of the subsequent actual peer-teaching event would be higher. This higher formality level was supposed to increase the appeal on the individual accountability of the students to the shared result, being the preparation of the execution of peer- teaching. Aim: This study explores whether in-class formality during peer-teaching in a small group stimulates perceived participation, satisfaction and learning gain. Methods: Four in-class formality levels of peer-teaching (A-D) were defined and practiced in thirty group assignments of about 15 students, using a randomized cluster design with four arms: A) absence of peer-teaching, B) informal peer-teaching, C) and D) peer-teaching with the use of a frontal class presentation. Peer-teacher selection was either executed by the peers (B and C) or by throwing a dice just prior to the presentation (D). All students took a pretest, a post-test and a follow-up test and completed a questionnaire. The Friedman test, Wilcoxon’s signed ranks test and ANOVA were used to analyze the questionnaires. Learning gain was analyzed using a repeated measures ANOVA. Results: The overall scores on the satisfaction and perceived participation increased significantly from A to D (p = 0.000) and the students in D scored higher than those in C (p = 0.007). For 10 out of 19 individual questions a significant difference was found. Mostly A scored lower than D or than C and D, but also differences between B, C and D were found in which D scored highest. The learning gain did not differ significantly between the arms. Conclusion: This study shows that, although student’s perceived participation and satisfaction rise with in-class formality level, the learning gains do not increase simultaneously. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|