A New Societal Self-Defense Theory of Punishment—The Rights-Protection Theory
Autor: | Hsin-wen Lee |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2017 |
Předmět: |
050502 law
Philosophy of mind Philosophy of science Punishment Public interest theory media_common.quotation_subject 05 social sciences Context (language use) 06 humanities and the arts 0603 philosophy ethics and religion Philosophy of language Philosophy Core (game theory) Political science 060302 philosophy Deterrence (legal) 0505 law media_common Law and economics |
Zdroj: | Philosophia. 46:337-353 |
ISSN: | 1574-9274 0048-3893 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11406-017-9931-z |
Popis: | In this paper, I propose a new self-defense theory of punishment, the rights-protection theory. By appealing to the interest theory of right, I show that what we call “the right of self-defense” is actually composed of the right(s) to protect our basic rights. The right of self-defense is not a single, self-standing right but a group of derivative rights justified by their contribution to the protection of the core, basic rights. Thus, these rights of self-defense are both justified and constrained by the basic rights they are supposed to protect. I then explain how this theory responds to a common objection. Opponents argue that, to exercise the right of self-defense, some threat must be present. However, in the context of punishment, the threat has already taken effect or is already gone. Thus, the right of self-defense becomes irrelevant when we punish an offender. I show that this objection is based on an implausibly narrow conception of self-defense. A reasonable conception would allow us to exercise our right of self-defense when there is a present definite threat, a future definite threat, or a potential threat. Thus, we may still exercise our right of self-defense in the context of punishment. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |