Applications of the bias–variance decomposition to human forecasting
| Autor: | Stephen B. Broomell, Patrick Bodilly Kane |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Computer science
Bootstrapping business.industry Process (engineering) Applied Mathematics 05 social sciences Human error Statistical model Human judgment Machine learning computer.software_genre 050105 experimental psychology 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Variance decomposition of forecast errors Errors-in-variables models 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences Artificial intelligence business computer Random variable 030217 neurology & neurosurgery General Psychology |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 98:102417 |
| ISSN: | 0022-2496 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.jmp.2020.102417 |
| Popis: | Forecasts are generated by both human experts and statistical models, and their forecast accuracy can be understood using error decompositions. However, the assumptions that underlie decompositions used in the analysis of human error differ substantially from those used in the analysis of models. The lens model, one of the most popular error decompositions for human errors, treats the beliefs of the human forecaster as fixed parameters to be estimated. Modern decompositions of model error treat the model as a random result from the process of fitting to noisy data. We highlight how these different approaches can be combined, expanding the application of the lens model to groups and opening up new perspectives on the study of human forecasting. We argue that treating human beliefs as the result of a process of learning from noisy data (even without specifying that process) can help to explain many documented phenomena in the world of forecasting such as: what kinds of environments human judgment will have difficulty with and what kinds they will be successful in; what conditions underlie the success of bootstrapping and aggregation of independent forecasts. Just as understanding statistical models as random variables has helped to improve the understanding of error in statistics and machines learning, we believe this framework will be able to help guide the literature on human judgment to a better understanding of error, its determinants and the mechanisms capable of improving forecasting accuracy. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect