A-246 Comparing Boston Naming Test Short Forms in a Rehabilitation Sample
| Autor: | Zimmerman D, Davis J, Attridge J, Rolin S |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Rehabilitation business.industry medicine.medical_treatment Sample (statistics) General Medicine medicine.disease Psychiatry and Mental health Clinical Psychology Short Forms Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology Boston Naming Test Physical medicine and rehabilitation Ischemic stroke Area under curve medicine Dementia business |
| Zdroj: | Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 35:1041-1041 |
| ISSN: | 1873-5843 |
| Popis: | Objective The Boston Naming Test (BNT) has several short forms do not include the noose item. These short forms have been mainly examined in dementia populations. This study compared BNT short forms with standard administration (BNT-S) in physical medicine and rehabilitation patients. Method Participants (N = 480) completed the BNT in an outpatient evaluation. The sample was 34% female and 91% white with average age and education of 46 (SD = 15) and 14 (SD = 3) years, respectively. Diagnoses included traumatic brain injury (62%), mixed neurologic conditions (21%), and stroke (17%). Five 15-item short forms were calculated: Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD-15); Lansing; and Mack 1, 2, and 4 (Mack-15.1, −15.2). Three 30-item short forms were calculated: Mack A, Saxon A, and BNT odd items. Short forms and BNT-S were compared with Spearman correlations. Cronbach’s alpha was calculated for all forms. Impaired BNT scores were determined using norm-referenced scores (T Results BNT-S showed strong correlations with 30-item (rho = .92–.93) and 15-item short forms (rho = .80–.87) except for CERAD-15 (rho = .69). Internal consistency was acceptable for 15-item (alpha = .72–.80) and 30-item short forms (alpha = .85–.86). BNT was impaired in 17% of participants. AUC values were not significantly different in 15-item (AUC = .83–.89) and 30-item (AUC = .91–.92) groups. CERAD-15 (.83), Mack-15.1 (.87), and Mack-15.2 (.87) AUC values were significantly lower than 30-item short form AUC values. Conclusion BNT 30-item and 15-item short forms showed outstanding and excellent classification accuracy, respectively. BNT short forms warrant further study in rehabilitation settings. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|