Practices in the construction of turns
| Autor: | Barbara A. Fox, Cecilia E. Ford, Sandra A. Thompson |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2022 |
| Předmět: |
Linguistics and Language
Parsing Point (typography) Computer science media_common.quotation_subject Intonation (linguistics) Context (language use) computer.software_genre Tone (literature) Language and Linguistics Linguistics Philosophy Conversation analysis Conversation Meaning (existential) computer media_common |
| Zdroj: | Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA). :427-454 |
| ISSN: | 2406-4238 1018-2101 |
| DOI: | 10.1075/prag.6.3.07for |
| Popis: | This study began with a simple question that has been on our minds, indMdually and collectively, for some time: What are the basic units of talk-in-conversation? Units in conversation must be understood as usable for the construction of joint activities, not merely as packages of information to be parsed. Features of turn construction are adapted to such functions as displaying responsiveness to other turns and making interpretable contributions to an ongoing interactional sequence. Furthermore, timing of speaker onset is crucial to the making of meaning in conversation, whether that onset is produced in overlap, after some gap, or precisely at the point where a current speaker stops. It has been manifestly clear for some time that, for the description of the basic units of talk-in-interaction, neither a strictly syntactic/semantic nor a strictly prosodic approach to conversational units will suffice by itself (Schegloff 1996); "sentences" and "clauses" are only part of the picture, but "tone units" (Crystal 7969; Cruttenden 1986) or "intonation units" (Chafe 1987, 1988, 1992, 7993, 1994; Du Bois et al. 1993) are also only part of the picture. The basic conversational unit must be an amalgam of at least these two types of units, but its niche in a developing interactional context must also play a major part in its construction. An obvious place to turn for discussion of this question is to Conversation Analysis (CA), since this framework has concerned itself intensively with the organization of turn-taking. In their celebrated and highly influential paper outlining the practices under$ing conversational turn-taking, Sacks et al. (1974) propose a model in which turns at talk are analyzed as being made up of "turn-constructional |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|