The average consumer is not a lawyer! Case C-66/19 JC v Kreissparkasse Saarlouis

Autor:	Peter Rott
Rok vydání:	2020
Předmět:	German Creditor Political Science and International Relations language Business Law Economic Justice Transparency (behavior) language.human_language Law and economics
Zdroj:	Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law. 27:379-386
ISSN:	2399-5548 1023-263X
DOI:	10.1177/1023263x20938989
Popis:	The Court of Justice had to decide on the transparency of information on the right of withdrawal in consumer credit law. Under German law, the creditor could describe the start of the withdrawal period by mere reference to a legal provision which then referred to other legal provisions which the consumer then had to interpret, which the Court of Justice considered to be lacking in transparency. In the background, there was a conflict between the referring court and the German Federal Supreme Court on the legal competence of the average consumer that the Court of Justice decided in favour of the referring court.
Databáze:	OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz:	https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::5528706bd8f29b173825a8cb810405a3 https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263x20938989 Zobrazit plný text záznamu