Adaptation, feasibility and performance of a brief clinic-based intervention to improve prevention practices among sexual minority men
Autor: | Allan Lal, Rick Crosby, Karyn Fulcher, Nathan J. Lachowsky |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
030505 public health
Behaviour change urogenital system business.industry urologic and male genital diseases medicine.disease female genital diseases and pregnancy complications nervous system diseases Men who have sex with men Sexual minority 03 medical and health sciences Psychiatry and Mental health Pre-exposure prophylaxis 0302 clinical medicine Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) Intervention (counseling) Medicine 030212 general & internal medicine Psychology (miscellaneous) 0305 other medical science business Adaptation (computer science) Reproductive health Clinical psychology |
Zdroj: | The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality. 28:355-364 |
ISSN: | 2291-7063 1188-4517 |
DOI: | 10.3138/cjhs.2019-0043 |
Popis: | Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBM) are disproportionately affected by sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections (STBBIs). Originally efficacious with young Black GBM in the United States, Focus on the Future (FoF) is a clinic-based, single session intervention aimed at improving prevention practices. We examined the applicability and acceptability of the program for ethnoracially diverse GBM. Participants were recruited from a GBM sexual health clinic in Vancouver. A pre-test, post-test repeated measures design was used with a single intervention arm. Twenty-five HIV-negative participants received the intervention and retention at 90-day follow-up was 92%. Mean age was 27.8 years (SD = 3.53), 54.2% were non-white. The intervention was highly acceptable: 86.9% liked it and 91.3% would recommend it to others. A number of positive outcomes were observed post-intervention such as higher scores on the correct condom-use self-efficacy scales (p = 0.03) and increased condom-use frequency with primary partners (p = 0.03). The main outcome was number of condom-protected anal intercourse events for both insertive and receptive sexual positions; there was no significant difference for either the insertive (p = 0.62) or receptive (p = 0.36) partner. However, when restricted to participants who were not using PrEP, there was a significant increase in the number of condom-protected receptive anal sex events (p = 0.02). Although not an intended effect of the intervention program, 30% (n = 6/20) of PrEP-naïve participants initiated PrEP during the 90-day follow-up. This adapted low-cost intervention was rated highly acceptable by participants and demonstrates promise for increasing STBBI prevention practices. Expanded intervention testing and implementation research is warranted. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |