Magnetic resonance imaging dynamics of contrast medium uptake in vestibular schwannomas
Autor: | Julian Prell, Christian Strauss, Jens Rachinger, Christian Scheller, Stefan Rampp, Tobias Engelhorn |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2011 |
Předmět: |
Vestibular system
medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry medicine.medical_treatment media_common.quotation_subject Dynamics (mechanics) Magnetic resonance imaging General Medicine Schwannoma medicine.disease Radiosurgery Lesion Contrast medium medicine Contrast (vision) medicine.symptom business Nuclear medicine media_common |
Zdroj: | Journal of Neurosurgery. 114:394-399 |
ISSN: | 1933-0693 0022-3085 |
DOI: | 10.3171/2010.5.jns10307 |
Popis: | Object Efficacy of radiosurgery in vestibular schwannoma (VS) is usually documented by changes of tumor size and by loss of contrast enhancement in MR imaging within the central portion of the lesion. Until now, however, correlation between contrast enhancement and timing of image acquisition in nontreated VS has not been analyzed systematically. The authors undertook this study to investigate changes in contrast enhancement with respect to latency of image acquisition after contrast agent administration. Methods The dynamics of contrast medium uptake were evaluated with T1-weighted VIBE MR imaging sequences performed immediately and 1.5, 3.5, 4.5, 9.5, and 11.5 minutes after administration of single dose of Gd in 21 patients with nontreated medium- to large-sized VSs. Signal-to-noise (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of tumors were evaluated, and volumes of central nonenhancing areas (NEAs) were determined. Results The interior appearance of the tumors changed considerably over time. The NEA significantly diminished in size (p < 0.0001, Friedman test) and almost completely disappeared in all but 2 patients. Compared to images at 1.5 minutes, NEA volumes decreased to a median of 36% at 3.5 minutes and 34% at 4.5 minutes, showing smaller changes after that—9% at 9.5 minutes and 3% at 11.5 minutes. Tumor SNR and CNR increased over time. The maximum change in the median values for SNR and CNR were a 72% increase and 117% increase, respectively; both occurred at 1.5 minutes after Gd administration. Conclusions Contrast enhancement in VS MR imaging varies according to the duration of the delay between contrast agent administration and image acquisition. Postradiotherapy changes in contrast enhancement of VS can therefore not be attributed only to effective radiotherapy. So-called “loss of central contrast enhancement” may be falsely detected because of timing. A standardized protocol with defined timing of image acquisition may increase comparability of contrast uptake in VS. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |