Science and Restoration Under a Big, Demon Haunted Tent: Reply to Giardina et al. (2007)

Autor: Robert J. Cabin
Rok vydání: 2007
Předmět:
Zdroj: Restoration Ecology. 15:377-381
ISSN: 1526-100X
1061-2971
DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-100x.2007.00233.x
Popis: In a recent editorial, I discussed how the culture of science, heterogeneity of nature, and real-world human complexities can limit the practical relevance of formal scientific research and argued that less formal approaches might often be more efficient and effective. Giardina et al. criticized this editorial and argued that formal science has and increasingly will play a central role in ecological restoration in particular and human progress in general. Here, I respond to these arguments and expand upon the ideas presented in my previous editorial. I further illustrate how despite superficial appearances the utilitarian value of formal science may often be largely indirect. I also argue that the complexities of ecological and human systems combined with the subjective values and political beliefs underlying restoration make transforming this discipline into a unified ‘‘hard science’’ virtually impossible. Because values and politics also underlie most environmental conflicts, and scientific inquiry is inherently unsuitable for resolving these kinds of disputes, the future success of restoration may depend more on political support than scientific progress. Dogmatic, nonfalsifiable faith in the universal superiority of ‘‘rigorous’’ scientific knowledge and methodologies can foster arrogance and intolerance and blind us to the ephemeral nature of scientific ‘‘truths’’ and the double-edged sword of scientific ‘‘progress.’’ My hope is that Society for Ecological Restoration International (SERI) will remain a big inclusive tent that embraces a healthy diversity of foci and approaches that emulate the extraordinary diversity we find within the natural ecosystems and human cultures we strive to preserve, restore, and reconnect.
Databáze: OpenAIRE