POS1171 TRIPLE THE RATE OF EMERGENCY ROOM VISITS AND HOSPITALIZATIONS FOR GOUT AMONG US BLACKS VS WHITES – 2019 NATIONWIDE ANALYSIS

Autor: C. Yokose, N. Mccormick, N. Lu, A. Joshi, L. Jackson, M. Kohler, J. Yinh, Y. Zhang, K. Saag, H. Choi
Rok vydání: 2022
Předmět:
Zdroj: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 81:913.3-914
ISSN: 1468-2060
0003-4967
DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.4189
Popis: BackgroundGout is a highly prevalent inflammatory arthritis with increasing global disease burden in recent years.1,2 Gout prevalence has been reported to be higher among Blacks compared to Whites,3 and that they are less likely to receive allopurinol in outpatient care.4 The potential nationwide impact of these racial disparities on emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations is unknown.ObjectivesTo examine the contemporary racial disparities in ED visits and hospitalizations with a primary discharge diagnosis of gout in the US (2019).MethodsWe compared ED visits and hospitalizations between Blacks and Whites in the latest data (2019) from the US National Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) and National Inpatient Sample (NIS). We focused on encounters for which the primary diagnosis was gout based on ICD codes (M1A.xx, M10.xx). We calculated annual population rates of ED visits and hospitalizations for gout (per 100,000 US adults) using the 2019 US census adult population (>18 years) according to race.ResultsThere were a total of 160,759 ED visits and 9,560 hospitalizations among White and Blacks with a gout diagnosis in the US in 2019. The mean age (58.2 years vs. 56.5 years) and male proportion (78.0% vs. 74.8%) tended to be higher among Whites, while more Blacks tended to live in the South (40.7% vs. 66.5%) and reported a median household income of < $50,000 (30.7% vs. 57.1%). Compared to Whites, Blacks had 2.7- and 3.2-fold higher rates of gout ED visits and hospitalizations, respectively, after adjusting for age, sex, payer, region, and household income (Table 1 & Figure 1). Black women, in particular, had 3.4- and 4.0-fold higher rates of ED visits and hospitalizations compared to White women, while the corresponding rate ratios for men were 2.5 and 2.8, respectively. The mean costs per gout ED visit were similar for Blacks compared to Whites (adjusted difference, -$7.6 [95% CI, -25.4 to 1.0]), while hospitalizations were more costly (adjusted difference, $1,055.3 [95% CI, 553.1 to 1557.5]). The duration of ED visits and hospitalizations was also higher among Blacks than Whites (adjusted difference of 0.41 days [95% CI, 0.19 to 0.63] and 0.59 days [95% CI, 0.25 to 0.94], respectively).Table 1.Racial Disparities in Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalizations with Primary Diagnosis of Gout in 2019Emergency Department VisitsHospitalizationsRaceWhiteBlackWhiteBlackAll6801196524521330198510434519150Visits, N888107194962003360Rate per 100,000130.6293.431.274.4Rate Ratio (95% CI)*1.0 (ref)2.81 (2.63, 3.00)1.0 (ref)3.08 (2.79, 3.40)Rate Ratio (95% CI)**1.0 (ref)2.66 (2.50, 2.82)1.0 (ref)3.17 (2.86, 3.50)Women3785136914363031110390932647105Visits, N195671816317701145Rate per 100,00051.7126.516.043.3Rate Ratio (95% CI)*1.0 (ref)3.68 (3.39, 3.99)1.0 (ref)4.01 (3.40, 4.73)Rate Ratio (95% CI)**1.0 (ref)3.36 (3.11, 3.62)1.0 (ref)4.02 (3.39, 4.78)Men301561011015657388098151871620Visits, N692285378344302215Rate per 100,000229.6529.550.3118.3Rate Ratio (95% CI)*1.0 (ref)2.59 (2.42, 2.78)1.0 (ref)2.66 (2.36, 3.00)Rate Ratio (95% CI)**1.0 (ref)2.47 (2.32, 2.64)1.0 (ref)2.77 (2.45, 3.14)*Adjusted for age and sex for all, adjusted for age for sex-specific rate ratios**Adjusted for age, sex, payment, region, and household incomeConclusionThese latest national data indicate that ED visits and hospitalization due to gout are both 3 times higher among Blacks than Whites; this disparity was particularly prominent among women with gout. Higher risk of developing gout3 and suboptimal care4 both translate to these avoidable costly healthcare utilizations, calling for improved primary prevention and gout care.References[1]Safiri et al., PMID 32755051[2]Xia et al., PMID 31624843[3]Chen-Xu et al., PMID 30618180[4]Krishnan et al., PMID 18260174Disclosure of InterestsChio Yokose: None declared, Natalie McCormick: None declared, Na Lu: None declared, Amit Joshi: None declared, Lesley Jackson: None declared, Minna Kohler Speakers bureau: Lilly, Consultant of: Mymee, Novartis, Grant/research support from: Setpoint Medical, Janeth Yinh: None declared, Yuqing Zhang: None declared, Kenneth Saag Consultant of: Arthrosi, Atom Bioscience, Horizon Therapeutics, LG Pharma, Mallinkrodt, SOBI, Takeda, Grant/research support from: Horizon Therapeutics, SOBI, Shanton, Hyon Choi Consultant of: Ironwood, Selecta, Horizon, Takeda, Kowa, and Vaxart, Grant/research support from: Ironwood and Horizon
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: