Do physicians accept quality of life and utility measurement?
Autor: | H. Sintonen, Hans-Helmut König, C. Hoffmann, Reiner Leidl, J.-M. von der Schulenburg, B. Abbühl |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2001 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Health economics business.industry Economic utility 030503 health policy & services Health Policy Public health Economics Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous) Health states 3. Good health Health care management Quality-adjusted life year 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Environmental health Family medicine Health care Medicine 030212 general & internal medicine Mail questionnaire 0305 other medical science business |
Zdroj: | The European Journal of Health Economics (HEPAC). 2:170-175 |
ISSN: | 1618-7598 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10198-001-0080-7 |
Popis: | This study investigates to what extent physicians accept quality of life (QoL) and economic utility measures as endpoints in clinical studies. It also explores who physicians think should value health states. As part of a European study three different physician groups were surveyed using a standardized mail questionnaire. These surveys were carried out by national random sample in Finland (rendering n=367) and by nonrandom samples in Austria (n=33), and Germany (n=41). Acceptance of utility measurement was classified by a four-level hierarchy. Knowledge of the QoL concept ranged between 30% and 54% in the three samples. QoL was accepted by 72–90% of physicians, a summary index of QoL by 62–80%, its combination with duration by 51–68%, and quality-adjusted life years by 44–61%. Most physicians felt that health care professionals should value health states, and 92–94% considered common effect measures in clinical and economic studies to be desirable or necessary. Most physicians surveyed accepted QoL as a study endpoint, a significant share accepted utility measurement. Evaluating health effects by common measures is considered an important challenge. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |