Current Attitudes Toward Drug Checking Services and a Comparison of Expected with Actual Drugs Present in Street Drug Samples Collected from Opioid Users

Autor: James A. Swartz, Marya Lieberman, A. David Jimenez, Mary Ellen Mackesy-Amiti, Heather Whitehead, Kathleen Hayes, Lisa Robison-Taylor, Elizabeth Prete
Rok vydání: 2022
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2273560/v1
Popis: Background: The opioid epidemic continues to cause high numbers of fatalities in the US and other countries, driven mainly by the inclusion of potent synthetic opioids in street drugs. Drug checking by means of various technologies is being increasingly implemented as a harm reduction strategy to inform users about constituent drugs in their street samples. We assessed how valued drug checking services (DCS) would be for opioid street drug users given the ubiquity of fentanyl and related analogs in the drug supply, the information they would most value from drug checking, and compared expected versus actual constituent drugs in collected samples. Methods: A convenience sample of opioid street drug users (N = 118) was recruited from two syringe service exchange programs in Chicago between 2021-2022. We administered brief surveys asking about overdose history, fentanyl preference, and interest in DCS. We also collected drug samples and asked participants what drug(s) they expected were in the sample. Provided samples were analyzed using LC-MS technology and the results compared to their expected drugs. Results: Participants reported an average of 4.4 lifetime ODs (SD=4.8, range=0-20) and 1.1 (SD=1.8, range=0-10) past-year ODs. A majority (92.1%) believed they had recently used drugs containing fentanyl. Opinions about the desirability of fentanyl were mixed with 56.1% indicating they did not and 38.0 % indicating they did prefer fentanyl. Attitudes towards DCS indicated a general but not uniform receptiveness with a majority indicating interest in DCS though sizeable minorities believed DCS was ”too much trouble” (25.2%) or there was “no point” in testing (35.4%). Participants were especially poor at identifying common cutting agents and potentiating drugs such as diphenhydramine in their samples. They reported having quantitative information on drug concentrations and identification of all constituent drugs present in a sample would be especially valuable. Conclusions: Results affirmed street drug users remain interested in using DCS to monitor their drugs and such services should be more widely available. Advanced checking technologies that provide information on the relative quantities and the different drugs present in a given sample available at point-of-care, would be most valuable but remain challenging to implement.
Databáze: OpenAIRE