JPSS-1 ATMS Postlaunch Active Geolocation Analysis
| Autor: | R.V. Leslie, Edward J. Kim, I. Osaretin, Cheng-Hsuan Lyu, Lisa McCormick |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. 59:9462-9471 |
| ISSN: | 1558-0644 0196-2892 |
| DOI: | 10.1109/tgrs.2020.3047339 |
| Popis: | A NOAA-20 (N20) Advanced Technology Microwave Sounder (ATMS) active geolocation (GEO) test was performed around January 2018 with 24 preselected coastline crossing scenes. After a comprehensive analysis of ATMS stare data and the corresponding Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) data, the ATMS pitch, roll, and yaw pointing angle errors are found from the nadir perpendicular, the nadir oblique shallow angle, and the off-nadir perpendicular coastline crossing data, respectively. In this study, we first determine the ATMS radiometric coastline crossing time by using the ATMS radiometric count data. Since the coastline can be located anywhere within one ATMS field of view (FOV) from the passive (regular scanning) GEO data, depending on the scan starting time, it is not a valid assumption for the inflection point being the same as the coastline location. Consequently, using the passive GEO data to validate the sensor’s on-orbit pointing angle performance is limited. After finding the ATMS radiometric coastline crossing time from the ATMS data, we compare it with the VIIRS effective time stamp. Specifically, the VIIRS M3, M4, and M5 (true color) and M15 and M16 bands (thermal) data have a much smaller footprint size. Using the differences of the ATMS and VIIRS (effective) coastlines crossing times, the N20 ATMS pitch, roll, and yaw pointing angle errors are found to be −0.09°, −0.24°, and 0.28°, respectively. To determine ATMS GEO properly, these on-orbit pointing errors need to be corrected, adding to the ATMS sensor data record (SDR) processing coefficient table, and passed on to the operational GEO processing code. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|