Erratum à: Le vidéolaryngoscope permet une intubation avec un tube à double lumière plus rapide que le laryngoscope standard

Autor: Ali Akhaddar, Hicham Azendour, A. Elwali, Hassan Alaoui, Mustapha Bensghir, Jaafar Salim Lalaoui, Mohamed Meziane, Nouredine Drissi Kamili, M. Drissi
Rok vydání: 2011
Předmět:
Zdroj: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie. 58:347-347
ISSN: 1496-8975
0832-610X
DOI: 10.1007/s12630-011-9457-y
Popis: This study was designed to compare videolaryngoscopy with direct laryngoscopy with respect to ease of intubation when inserting a double lumen tube (DLT). In this prospective randomized study 68 patients American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II were included. Patients with criteria indicating possible difficult intubation were excluded. The patients were randomized into two groups, depending on the tool used to facilitate intubation: videolaryngoscope (VL group) or direct laryngoscopy (DL group). The time required for intubation was the primary endpoint. Cormack and Lehane glottic visualization (CL) scores, the need for external laryngeal maneuvers and the number of attempts were measured. Glottic visualization was better in the VL group than in the DL group. The CL scores were I, II and III in 24, eight and two patients, respectively, in the VL group compared with 13, 11 and eight in the DL group (P = 0.025). Patients in the VL group required fewer attempts than the DL group (P = 0.019). Intubation time was 39.9 ± 4.4 sec in the VL group and 47.9 ± 5.4 sec in the DL group (P
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: