Comparison of neoadjuvant anti-HER2 therapy for breast cancer in public versus private health care: Time to shorten the distance
Autor: | Diocesio Alves Pinto de Andrade, Noelle Suemi Wassano, Luiza Damian Ribeiro Barbosa, Jessica Ribeiro Gomes, Marcelo Rocha Cruz, Virginia Moreira Braga, Jessica Sayuri Tsukamoto |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2017 |
Předmět: | |
Zdroj: | Journal of Clinical Oncology. 35:e18045-e18045 |
ISSN: | 1527-7755 0732-183X |
DOI: | 10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.e18045 |
Popis: | e18045 Background: In the neoadjuvant setting (NAC) of HER2-positive breast cancer (BC), the addition of pertuzumab (P) to trastuzumab (T) and chemotherapy (chemo) has increased pathological complete response (pCR) from 40-50% to over 70%. Recent data has shown that pCR is a reliable surrogate marker of disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS). In Brazil, there is an important gap between cancer drugs approved in the public health care system (PHCS) vs. the private setting. Although P approval for NAC (Aug/2016) and metastatic setting (Sep/2015) in the private health system, it is not approved for any indication in the PHCS. Likewise, T is not approved for use as NAC at the PHCS. We aim to compare private practice experience of T + P + chemo in the NAC vs. HER2-positive advanced BC patients treated at the PHCS. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 95 patients diagnosed with locally advanced HER2-positive BC by immunohistochemistry 3+ or FISH according to ASCO/CAP definition. We evaluated 17 consecutive patients at the COAEM private cancer center in Brazil since Feb/2014 (cohort 1). Neoadjuvant therapy was T and P plus docetaxel-based chemo. A cohort of 78 patients with locally advanced HER2-positive BC treated in a PHCS cancer center was analyzed (cohort 2). They received standard NAC regimen according to PHCS guidance: anthracycline and taxane-based therapy without anti-HER2 therapy. Results: Cohort 1: 17 patients with median age of 50 years (range 34-70); Four patients had clinical stage IIA; 2 patients IIB; 7 patients IIIA; 3 patients IIIB; one patient IIIC. The pCR rate was 70.5% (12 patients). Cohort 2: 78 patients with median age of 48 years (range 26-79). One patient IIB; 33 patients IIIA; 37 patients IIIB; 7 patients IIIC. The pCR rate was 16.7% (13 patients); 29 patients (37.2%) had clinical complete response. Only 26 patients (33.3%) received T in the adjuvant setting. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant P and T combined with chemo has shown pCR rates superior to 70% in clinical trials, which is a surrogate marker for DFS and OS in HER2-positive BC. The absence of anti-HER2 therapy in the PHCS must be urgently reviewed not just in light of double-blockage strategy but also in T monotherapy use. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |