The distributive cycle: Evidence and current debates
| Autor: | Codrina Rada, Ivan Mendieta-Muñoz, Daniele Tavani, Rudiger von Arnim, Jose Barrales-Ruiz |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Economic Surveys. 36:468-503 |
| ISSN: | 1467-6419 0950-0804 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/joes.12432 |
| Popis: | This paper surveys current debates on the distributive cycle. The literature builds on R.M. Goodwin’s seminal 1967 chapter titled “A growth cycle.” We review theoretical motivations for the distributive cycle, which, despite signif-icant differences, all imply that macroeconomic activity leads the labor share in a counter-clockwise cycle in the activity-labor share plane. Subsequently, we summarize and update evidence on the existence of a distributive cycle, with a focus on the post-war US macroeconomy. We analyze activity and labor share series and their interaction in the frequency domain, and also employ stan-dard vector autoregressions. Results confirm the distributive cycle for the US post-war period. We contextualize results vis-`a-vis current debates: (1) we consider a financial cycle, to rebut the theoretical possibility of “pseudo-Goodwin” cycles, (2) demonstrate that a suppressed labor share and stagnation are com-patible with short run Goodwin cycles, and argue that this link presents the way forward for research on secular stagnation. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|