Переваги і недоліки політики мультикультуралізму

Rok vydání:	2019
Předmět:	політика мультикультуралізм полікультурне суспільство міжкультурний діалог соціокультурний конфлікт politics multiculturalism multicultural society intercultural dialogue socio-cultural conflict
DOI:	10.5281/zenodo.3240905
Popis:	Проаналізовано наукові підходи до розуміння сутності політики мультикультуралізму. Розкрито позитивні та негативні наслідки вказаної політики з урахуванням наявного закордонного досвіду. Встановлено, що критики політики мультикультуралізму звертають увагу на те, що вона руйнує єдність суспільства, обмежує права культурної більшості, породжує серед мігрантів феномен власної переваги тощо. Доведено, що політика мультикультуралізму має потужний демократичний потенціал, оскільки вона створює реальні умови неконфліктного співіснування різних культурних груп у межах території держави. Наголошено на тому, що політика мультикультуралізму є ефективним інструментом вирішення проблеми співіснування культур за умови пошуку нових форм і методів її реалізації з урахуванням національних та історичних особливостей розвитку кожного суспільства. Зроблено висновок стосовно доцільності впровадження політики мультикультуралізму в Україні. Policies of multiculturalism are one of the options for solving the problem of peaceful coexistence of representatives of different cultures on the state territory. Despite a large number of publications on the problems of multiculturalism, the social sciences and humanities do not have a single position on the meaning of this category, as well as the appropriateness of introducing a corresponding state policy in modern conditions. The object of research is social relations that determine the features of coexistence of representatives of different cultures on the state territory. The subject of research is the advantages and disadvantages of multiculturalism policy. The purpose of the article is to reveal the positive and negative consequences of the policies of multiculturalism, taking into account the achievements and mistakes of its implementation in the leading countries of the world. The need to achieve the purpose of the study led to the use of so methods of cognition as formal-logical, systemic, historical, critical and comparative. The scientific approaches to understanding the essence of the policy of multiculturalism are analyzed. The positive and negative consequences of this policy were revealed taking into account the existing foreign experience. It has been established that critics of the policy of multiculturalism draw attention to the fact that it destroys the unity of society, restricts the rights of the cultural majority, and creates preconditions for the emergence of intercultural conflicts and so on. It is proved that the policy of multiculturalism has a strong democratic potential since it creates real conditions for non-conflicting coexistence of different cultural groups. It is concluded that the policy of multiculturalism remains an effective tool for solving the problem of coexistence of cultures subject to search for new forms and methods for its implementation taking into account national and historical peculiarities of the development of each society. The practical value of the work lies in the fact that the substantiated provisions and conclusions in it deepen the scientific knowledge of multiculturalism politics. The obtained results can be used in the process of teaching the theory of state and law, comparative law and in solving practical problems related to the process of improving intercultural dialogue in Ukraine. {"references":["1.\tBenhabib, S. (2002). The Claims of Culture: Equality and Diversity in the Global Era. Princeton; Oxford: Princeton University Press.","2.\tBommes, M. (2006). Migration and Migration Research in Germany. In: Ellie Vasta, Vasoodeven Vuddamalay. International Migration and the Social Sciences. Confronting National Experiences in Australia, France and Germany. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. S. 143-221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230505841_4.","3.\tGlazer, N. (1997). We are Multiculturalists Now. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.","4.\tKymlicka, W. (1995). Multicultural Citizenship: a Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.","5.\tKukathas, Ch. (2003). The Liberal Archipelago. A Theory of Diversity and Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.","6.\tNazarov, V. L. (2015). Teoriya i praktika mul'tikul'turalizma v stranah Zapada [Theory and practice of multiculturalism in Western countries]. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta (in Russ.).","7.\tMykhailych, O. V. (2015). Analiz teoretychnykh pidkhodiv doslidzhennia multykulturalizmu u sotsiolohii [An analysis of theoretical approaches to the study of multiculturalism in sociology]. In: Podoliaka, A. M. (Red.). Multykulturalizm yak sotsialno-pravove yavyshche: vyklyky hlobalizovanoho svitu. Kyiv: TOV \"Art-tekhnolohiia\". 55–65 (in Ukr.).","8.\tLihomanova, L. F., & Mel'nik, E. YU. (2008). Mul'tikul'turalizm kak gosudarstvennaya politika na federal'nom urovne (kanadskij opyt) [Multiculturalism as a state policy at the federal level (Canadian experience)]. Upravlencheskoe konsul'tirovanie, (4). 50–61 (in Russ.).","9.\tPopov, A. V. (2013). Mul'tikul'turalizm i nacional'naya identichnost' v kontekste sovremennosti [Multiculturalism and national identity in the context of modernity]. Trudy Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul'tury i iskusstv, (199). 73–84 (in Russ.).","10.\tKholodova, O. A. (2011). Pidkhody do intehratsii imihrantiv–musulman : nimetska ta brytanska modeli [Approaches to the integration of Muslim immigrants: German and British models]. Hileia, (47). 765–770 (in Ukr.).","11.\tKozlovets, M. A., & Mykhailova, M. O. (2010). Multykulturalizm i problema yednosti suspilstva [Multiculturalism and the problem of unity of society]. In: XX stolittia – etnonatsionalnyi vymir ta problemy Holokostu: zb. nauk. prats za mater. mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konferentsii (22–23 zhovtnia 2010 r., Zhytomyr). 464–472 (in Ukr.).","12.\tVeretevskaya, A. V. (2011). Problemy evropejskogo mul'tikul'turalizma [Problems of European Multiculturalism]. Sravnitel'naya politika, (3). 114–121 (in Russ.).","13.\tKhalilova-Chuvaieva, Yu. O., & Bubnov, I. V. (2013). Yevropeiska polityka multykulturalizmu i kryza natsionalnoi identychnosti: politychnyi aspect [European Policy of Multiculturalism and the Crisis of National Identity: The Political Aspect]. Visnyk DonNUET, (2). 66–77 (in Ukr.).","14.\tBarry, B. (2001). Culture and Equality: An Egalitarian Critique of Multiculturalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.","15.\tKuropyatnik, A. I. (2000). Mul'tikul'turalizm : problemy social'noj stabil'nosti polietnicheskih obshchestv [Multiculturalism: problems of social stability of polyethnic societies]. St. Petersburg: Izd-vo SPbGU (in Russ.).","16.\tKarlova, V. (2011). Multykulturalizm yak polityko-ideolohichna doktryna: problemy ta vyklyky [Multiculturalism as a political and ideological doctrine: Issues and Challenges]. Zb. nauk. pr. NADU, (1). 209–220 (in Ukr.).","17.\tPecheranskyi, I. P. (2015). Multykulturna spravedlyvist yak problema ta polityko-filosofskyi dyskurs [Multicultural justice as a problem and political and philosophical discourse]. In: Podoliaka, A. M. (Red.). Multykulturalizm yak sotsialno-pravove yavyshche: vyklyky hlobalizovanoho svitu. Kyiv: TOV \"Art-tekhnolohiia\". 37–54 (in Ukr.).","18.\tModood, Tariq (2007). Multiculturalism: a civic idea. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2007.","19.\tZhanhozha, R. (2016). Multykulturalizm : pro et contra [Multiculturalism: pro et contra]. Kyiv: DU \"Instytut vsesvitnoi istorii NAN Ukrainy\" (in Ukr.).","20.\tParekh, B. (2000). Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory. London: MacMillan.","21.\tLiapina, L. A. (2015). Rivnopravnyi dialoh kultur yak osnova suchasnoho suspilstva: multykulturnyi proekt Bkhikkhu Parekkha [Equal Dialogue of Cultures as the Basis of Contemporary Society: Multicultural Project of Bhikhu Parekh]. Ukrainskyi sotsium, (4). 46-53 (in Ukr.).","22.\tLiapina, L. A. (2018). Multykulturalizm yak sotsiokulturnyi fenomen suchasnosti: ambivalentnist pidkhodiv [Multiculturalism as a sociocultural phenomenon of the present: ambivalence of approaches]. International scientific and practical conference world science, 4(9). 11–15 (in Ukr.).","23.\tKolodii, A. (2008). Amerykanska doktryna multykulturalizmu i etnonatsionalnyi rozvytok Ukrainy [American doctrine of multiculturalism and ethno-national development of Ukraine]. Ahora. Ukraina i SShA: vzaiemodiia u haluzi polityky, ekonomiky, kultury i nauky. (6). 5–14 (in Ukr.).","24.\tKornat, L. Ya. (2015). Perspektyvy zastosuvannia teorii intehruiuchoho multykulturalizmu pry vyroblenni kontseptualnykh pidkhodiv do upravlinnia etnokulturnoiu riznomanitnistiu v Ukraini [Prospects for the application of the theory of integrational multiculturalism in the development of conceptual approaches to the management of ethno-cultural diversity in Ukraine]. Aspekty publichnoho upravlinnia, (7/8). 11–20 (in Ukr.)."]}
Databáze:	OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz:	https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::48d4a85562e6a3527be8d12a3ffe1ccf Zobrazit plný text záznamu