| Autor: |
Olabode, Shola, Zhang, Viana Nijia, Owens, Rebecca, Copilah-Ali, Jehana, Wu, Han, Kolomeets, Maxim, Spiliotopoulos, Tasos, Markeviciute, Karolina, van Moorsel, Aad, Farrand, Ben, Toreini, Ehsan, Williams, Julian, Elliott, Karen, Coopamootoo, Kovila, Shi, Lei, Mehrnezhad, Maryam, Katsigiannis, Stamos, Vlachokyriakos, Vasilis, Chambers, Deborah, Durrant, Abigail |
| Rok vydání: |
2022 |
| Předmět: |
|
| DOI: |
10.17605/osf.io/y2mek |
| Popis: |
Technological advances in the smart home have created new opportunities for supporting well-being and facilitating citizen empowerment but have enabled new types of complex online harms to develop (Sovacool et a., 2021; Lopez-Neira et al., 2019; Chatterjee et al., 2018; Dragiewicz et al, 2018; Tanczer et al., 2018a, 2018b Henry and Powell 2016). Recent statistics have indicated that ‘smart’ technology ownership is increasing yearly, driven by lower costs and increased accessibility (Statista Survey, 2022). Research around smart homes has also developed incrementally, focusing on technology perspectives at the expense of a user-centric approach sensitive to the harms, risks, and vulnerabilities posed by the smart home. What remains unclear is the information available about these complex online harms and their relationship to ‘smart home’ technology. The scoping review protocol reported herein addresses this gap of information by mapping contemporary literature to identify existing gaps in knowledge. It is intended that this preliminary review will provide the foundations for a more detailed systematic review of ‘smart home’ literature and form the basis of future outputs. The objective of this protocol is to systematically map multidisciplinary smart home research, identify knowledge gaps, and explore opportunities for further research. It was designed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) Statement. The design and methods for this scoping review comply with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) (Tricco et al., 2018). In addition, eligibility criteria were informed using the SPIDER guidelines (Methley et al., 2014). |
| Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
