| Popis: |
The response of pastures based on Lolium perenne L. and Trifolium subterraneum L. to single superphosphate was assessed at Hamilton, Victoria, by measuring the growth of pastures during winter, spring, and summer over 7 years from 1979 to 1987. The seasons were defined by the pattern of pasture production, rather than by calendar months. Winter was the period of constant growth rate following the autumn rain; spring was the period of accelerating growth rate until growth rate changed abruptly following the onset of dry summer weather. Pastures were grazed with sheep at a low, medium, or high grazing pressure, corresponding generally to stocking rates of 10, 14, or 18 sheep/ha. At each level of grazing pressure, single superphosphate was applied at 5 rates from 1979 to 1982; the highest rate, expressed as elemental phosphorus (P), was reduced from 100 to 40 kg/ha during this time. In addition there was an unfertilised treatment. In 1984, fertiliser was applied at 6 rates from 4 to 40 kg P/ha. No fertiliser was applied in the remaining years, including 1983. Pasture production was measured from 1979 to 1982 and from 1985 to 1987. Total pasture dry matter (DM) accumulation per year at the highest stocking rate was less than the other treatments in 4 of the years. Averaged over all years and fertiliser treatments, the annual net production was 10·1, 10·1, and 9·0 t DM/ha (P < 0·05) for plots grazed at low, medium, and high stocking rates, respectively. The amount of fertiliser required to reach a given proportion of maximum yield response did not vary between winter and spring in any year, but the greater potential yield in spring (P < 0 ·001) meant that as more fertiliser was applied, the disparity between pasture grown in winter and pasture grown in spring increased. Differences in this disparity between extreme levels of P ranged from 1·4 t DM/ha in a drought to about 7 t DM/ha in a good season. The implications for managing farms when pastures are fertilised at higher rates than currently practised by district farmers are that systems of animal production with a requirement for plentiful good quality pasture in spring, such as ewes lambing in spring, should be used. The benefit of spring lambing over autumn lambing was supported when the 2 systems were compared over 26 years using the GrassGro decision support system. Well fertilised pasture systems will also allow more scope for conserving pasture as hay or silage, and increase opportunities for diversification in the farming enterprise, such as spring-growing crops. |
