Щодо Нормативного Врегулювання Імунітету Захисника В Кримінальному Процесуальному Законодавстві України

Rok vydání: 2018
Předmět:
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1405233
Popis: Розглянуто ключові нормативні положення чинного законодавства України, які у своєму комплексі формують особливості нормативного врегулювання та реалізації імунітету захисника в національному кримінальному процесуальному законодавстві. Зосереджено увагу на окремих правових колізіях законодавчих актів України, вирішення яких забезпечить належне функціонування правового інституту імунітету захисника в межах кримінальних проваджень. Запропоновано авторський підхід на вирішення окресленого питання, сприятиме оптимальному співіснуванню комплексу правових актів, що регулюють функціонування окресленого правового інституту в кримінальній процесуальній дійсності нашої держави. Рассмотрены ключевые нормативные положения действующего законодательства Украины, которые в своем комплексе формируют особенности нормативного урегулирования и реализации иммунитета защитника в национальном уголовном процессуальном законодательстве. Внимание сосредоточено на отдельных правовых коллизиях законодательных актах Украины, разрешение которых обеспечит надлежащее функционирование правового института иммунитета защитника в пределах уголовных судопроизводств. Предложенный авторский подход для решения очерченного вопроса, будет способствовать оптимальному сосуществованию комплекса правовых актов, регулирующих функционирование правового института иммунитета защитника в уголовной процессуальной действительности нашего государства. The article considers separate normative aspects of the specific character of lawyer's immunity in the criminal procedural legislation of Ukraine. The main normative provisions of the current legislation of Ukraine are considered, which in its complex form the peculiarities of the normative regulation and implementation of the lawyer's immunity in the national criminal procedural law. The attention is focused on certain legal conflicts of legislative acts of Ukraine, the solution of which will ensure the proper functioning of the legal institution of the immunity of the lawyer within the framework of criminal proceedings. The normative features of the influence of this type of immunity on persons who are not lawyers in criminal proceedings are considered, however, taking into account the specifics of their practical activity, possess information which is a matter of lawyer's secrecy. In this case, the assistant lawyer, trainee, and persons who are in labor relations with a lawyer, a lawyer's office, a lawyer's association, as well as a person in respect of which the right to practice advocacy has been suspended or suspended, is a matter of this case. The author's approach to solving the aforementioned issue is proposed, with the introduction of the indicated persons to the list of participants in criminal proceedings, who are obliged to adhere to the conditions of preservation of the lawyer's secrecy, and under any conditions should not be able to decide, at their own discretion, on the preservation of the information of the specified category. The said will promote optimal coexistence of a set of legal acts regulating the functioning of the outlined law institute of the immunity of a lawyer in the criminal procedural reality of our state. The content of the lawyer's secrecy is analyzed taking into account the current specification of the norms of the domestic legislation that regulate its content. Focused attention is paid to the following legislative acts: Laws of Ukraine "On protection of personal data"; "On advocacy and advocacy activities"; "On the principles of preventing and combating corruption". The ways of normalizing among them the content of the said legislative acts for the purpose of unambiguous interpretation of the contents of the lawyer's secrecy to the definition of the conditions for its dissemination is proposed.
{"references":["1. Volkotrub, S. H. (2003). Imunitet i problemy yoho zakhystu v kryminalʹnomu sudochynstvi [Immunity and problems of its protection in criminal proceedings]. Extended abstract of candidate's thesis (12.00.09). Kharkiv (in Ukr.).","2. Veselov, M. YU., Zaremba, T. S., & Oleshytsʹka, V. E. (2016). Instytut imunitetu svidka v kryminalʹno-protsesualʹnomu pravi [Institute of Immunity of a witness in criminal procedure law]. Yurydychnyy naukovyy elektronnyy zhurnal: elektron. nauk. fakhove vyd., (3). 124–128 (in Ukr.).","3. Voynarovych, A. B. (2015). Osoblyvosti dopytu advokata yak svidka u kryminalʹnomu provadzhenni [Fea-tures of interrogation of a lawyer as a witness in a criminal proceeding]. Naukovyy visnyk Mizhnarodnoho humanitarnoho universytetu, (18). 137–140 (in Ukr.).","4. Sali, S., & Zyberi, G. (2017). Functional Immunity for Defence Counsel and Defence. Staff in C. Rohan and G. Zyberi (eds.), Defence Perspectives on International Criminal Justice (Cambridge University Press, April) 173–203. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2977304 (in Eng.).","5. Groves, M., & Derham. M. S. (2004). Hould Advocates' Immunity Continue? MelbULawRw, 28(1) 3; Mel-bourne University Law Review 80. Retrieved from: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/MelbULawRw/2004/3.html (in Eng.).","6. Koni, A. F. (2011). Nravstvennyye nachala v ugolovnom protsesse [Moral principles in the criminal process]. Sobraniye sochineniy. Tom 4. Moskva: Yuridicheskaya literatura (in Russ.).","7. Bolocan M. P. Professional legal ethics: a comparative perspective. CEELI Concept Paper Series. Washington D.C. (in Eng.).","8. Gippini-Fournier, E. (2004). Legal professional privilege in competition proceedings before the European commission: beyond the cursory glance. Fordham International Law Journal (in Eng.).","9. Mizhnarodnyy pakt pro hromadyansʹki i politychni prava [International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights]. (16.12.1966). Retrieved from: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_043 (in Ukr.).","10. Konventsiya pro zakhyst prav lyudyny i osnovopolozhnykh svobod [Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms]. (04.11.1950). Retrieved from: http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_004 (in Ukr.).","11. Standarty nezalezhnosti yurydychnoyi profesiyi mizhnarodnoyi asotsiatsiyi yurystiv [Standards for the independence of the legal profession of the International Bar Association]. Retrieved from: http://bibliograph.com.ua/kodex-9/24.htm (in Ukr.).","12. Osnovni pryntsypy, shcho stosuyutʹsya roli yurystiv [Basic Principles Regarding the Role of Lawyers]. (07.09.1990). Retrieved from: http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_313 (in Ukr.).","13. Zahalʹnyy kodeks pravyl dlya advokativ krayin Yevropeysʹkoho Spivtovarystva [General Code of Conduct for Lawyers of the European Communities]. (01.10.1988). Retrieved from: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_343 (in Ukr.).","14. Pro advokaturu ta advokat•sʹku diyalʹnistʹ [On Advocacy and Advocacy]. Zakon Ukrayiny (05.07.2012 No 5076–6). Retrieved from: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/5076-17 (in Ukr.).","15. Pro zakhyst personalʹnykh danykh [About protection of personal data]. Zakon Ukrayiny (01.06.2010 No 2297–6). Retrieved from: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2297-17 (in Ukr.)."]}
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: