Sensitivity of Space Launch System Buffet Forcing Functions to Buffet Mitigation Options
| Autor: | Russ D. Rausch, Martin K. Sekula, David J. Piatak |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2016 |
| Předmět: |
020301 aerospace & aeronautics
Engineering Booster (rocketry) business.industry Payload 02 engineering and technology Aerodynamics Strake Avionics Aeroelasticity 01 natural sciences 010305 fluids & plasmas 0203 mechanical engineering 0103 physical sciences Space Launch System Aerospace engineering business Transonic |
| Zdroj: | 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. |
| DOI: | 10.2514/6.2016-0544 |
| Popis: | Time-varying buffet forcing functions arise from unsteady aerodynamic pressures and are one of many load environments, which contribute to the overall loading condition of a launch vehicle during ascent through the atmosphere. The buffet environment is typically highest at transonic conditions and can excite the vehicle dynamic modes of vibration. The vehicle response to these buffet forcing functions may cause high structural bending moments and vibratory environments, which can exceed the capabilities of the structure, or of vehicle components such as payloads and avionics. Vehicle configurations, protuberances, payload fairings, and large changes in stage diameter can trigger undesirable buffet environments. The Space Launch System (SLS) multi-body configuration and its structural dynamic characteristics presented challenges to the load cycle design process with respect to buffet-induced loads and responses. An initial wind-tunnel test of a 3-percent scale SLS rigid buffet model was conducted in 2012 and revealed high buffet environments behind the booster forward attachment protuberance, which contributed to reduced vehicle structural margins. Six buffet mitigation options were explored to alleviate the high buffet environments including modified booster nose cones and fences/strakes on the booster and core. These studies led to a second buffet test program that was conducted in 2014 to assess the ability of the buffet mitigation options to reduce buffet environments on the vehicle. This paper will present comparisons of buffet forcing functions from each of the buffet mitigation options tested, with a focus on sectional forcing function rms levels within regions of the vehicle prone to high buffet environments. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|