Active esophageal cooling for the prevention of thermal injury during atrial fibrillation ablation: a randomized controlled pilot study
Autor: | Emily Simon, Tiffany Sharkoski, Robert D. Schaller, David J. Callans, Francis E. Marchlinski, Saman Nazarian, Gregory E. Supple, Sara Attalla, David S. Frankel, Jonathan Salas, Cory M. Tschabrunn, David Lin, Matthew C. Hyman, Sanjay Dixit, Pasquale Santangeli |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
medicine.diagnostic_test Thermal injury business.industry medicine.medical_treatment Fistula Perforation (oil well) Atrial fibrillation 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology medicine.disease Ablation Endoscopy Surgery law.invention 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Randomized controlled trial Radiofrequency catheter ablation law Physiology (medical) medicine 030212 general & internal medicine Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine business |
Zdroj: | Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology. 63:197-205 |
ISSN: | 1572-8595 1383-875X |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10840-021-00960-w |
Popis: | Severe endoscopically detected esophageal thermal lesions (EDELs) have been associated with higher risk of progression to atrio-esophageal fistula (AEF) following radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of atrial fibrillation (AF). We sought to evaluate safety and feasibility of active esophageal cooling using the Attune Medical Esophageal Heat Transfer Device (EnsoETM) to limit frequency or severity of EDELs. We sought To evaluate safety and feasibility of active esophageal cooling using the Attune Medical Esophageal Heat Transfer Device (EnsoETM) to limit frequency or severity of EDELs Consecutive patients undergoing first-time RFCA were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to esophageal cooling (device group) or standard temperature monitoring (control group). Ablation on the posterior wall was performed with a maximum power of 30W for up to 20s. All patients underwent EGD within 48 h. Endoscopy findings were classified as 1, erythema–mild injury; 2, superficial ulceration–moderate injury; 3, deep ulceration–significant injury; and 4, fistula/perforation. Severe EDELs were defined as grade 3 or 4 lesions. Forty-four patients completed the study (22 device group, 22 control group). Adjunctive posterior wall isolation was performed more frequently in the device group (11/22, 50% vs. 4/22, 18%). EDELs were detected in 5/22 (23%) control group patients, with mild or moderate injury in 2/5 patients (40%) and severe thermal injury in 3/5 patients (60%). In the device group, EDELs were detected in 8/22 (36%) patients, with mild or moderate injury in 7/8 (87%) patients and severe thermal injury in 1/8 (12%) patients. There was no acute perforation or AEF during follow-up. Active esophageal cooling may reduce the occurrence of severe EDELs. A larger randomized study is warranted to further evaluate the benefit of this strategy. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |