| Autor: |
Van Duc Vo, Viet Nhan Nguyen, Thi Minh Thi Ha, Manh Linh Tran, Quang Vinh Truong, Ngoc Thanh Cao |
| Rok vydání: |
2015 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Journal of Medicine and Pharmacy. :115-126 |
| ISSN: |
1859-3836 |
| DOI: |
10.34071/jmp.2015.3.16 |
| Popis: |
Objective: Design an “in house” software for screening preeclampsia by maternal factors and mean arterial pressure at 11 – 13 gestational weeks in commune health centers. Methods: Based on the algorithms for calculating the risk of preeclampsia (PE) by maternal factors and mean artirial pressure at 11 - 13 gestational weeks in the study results of the authors, an “in house” software was deigned in Excel. The results of prediction preeclampsia by The Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF)(version 2.3) were compared with the results by “in house” software in 1110 singleton pregnant women. Results: The “in house” software met the requirements for calculating the risks of PE and save data. FMF risk for gestational hypertension disorder in pregnancy by maternal factors, mean arterial pressure,uterine artery Doppler and PAPP-A has an area under the curve of 0.68 (95%CI: 0.59 – 0.78). The “in house” software risk for gestational hypertension in pregnancy by maternal factors, mean arterial pressure has an area under the curve of 0.643 (0.55 – 0.73) There was no statistically significant different between two programs (p:0.52). The risk cut-off 1:50 in the prediction of gestational hypertension of the “in house” software was used to identify the group of high risk with detetion rate (DR) 28.6% (95%CI: 14.9-42.2) comparing to 40.5% (95%CI:25.6-55.3) of FMF. Conclusion: The FMF version 2.3 is better but in the absence of Doppler ultrasound and PAPP-A test in the commune health cares, the “in house” software for screening PE is a good tool for councelling, following up and early intervention for PE. |
| Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
