Core Judgments of Instructional Designers in Practice
| Autor: | Fatih Ergulec, Meina Zhu, Meize Guo, Ahmed Lachheb, Remzi Kizilboga, Haesol Bae, Candace Buggs, Zuheir N. Khlaif, Kei Tomita, Annisa Ratna Sari, Husa Alangari, Manal Alsaif, Ilona Marie Hajdu, Merve Basdogan, Khendum Gyabak, Ratrapee 'Inging' Techawitthayachinda, Elizabeth Boling |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2017 |
| Předmět: |
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Instructional design Field (Bourdieu) 05 social sciences Perspective (graphical) 050301 education Education Core (game theory) 0502 economics and business Engineering ethics Affect (linguistics) Engineering design process Psychology 0503 education Social psychology 050203 business & management |
| Zdroj: | Performance Improvement Quarterly. 30:199-219 |
| ISSN: | 0898-5952 |
| DOI: | 10.1002/piq.21250 |
| Popis: | The tacit beliefs that affect all the judgments made during the design process (core judgments) of 11 practicing instructional designers were studied via their discussions of strong and weak designs during interviews. Transcripts were analyzed from a phenomenological perspective. The study demonstrates that while designer judgment is rarely discussed in the field, these designers do appear to bring core judgments to bear on their designing, and these judgments are complex in nature. Researchers argue that core judgment, unaccounted for in rational models of instructional design, requires further attention from scholars and design educators. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text