Editorial

Autor:	Joseph B. Muhlestein, Jeffrey L. Anderson, Labros A. Karagounis
Rok vydání:	1996
Předmět:	medicine.medical_specialty Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty business.industry medicine.medical_treatment Primary angioplasty Thrombolysis medicine.disease Internal medicine Angioplasty Cardiology medicine Myocardial infarction Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine business
Zdroj:	The American Journal of Cardiology. 78:934-939
ISSN:	0002-9149
DOI:	10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00470-5
Popis:	Differing relative outcomes in randomized versus registry studies comparing primary angioplasty with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction suggest a clinical paradox. A predictive model based on differences in 5 treatment-related factors, including time to therapy, patency success, and angioplasty experience, suggests that relative outcomes may indeed vary, depending on the clinical setting in which therapy is given.
Databáze:	OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz:	https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::3be799fde51112ddd64dc63959b633f6 https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00470-5 Zobrazit plný text záznamu Full Text from ScienceDirect