Щодо участі державних підприємств України в реалізації державних функцій

Rok vydání:	2019
Předmět:	державне підприємство реалізація функцій держави управління державними підприємствами реформа управління державними підприємствами state-owned enterprise realization of functions of the state management of state-owned enterprises reform of management of state-owned enterprises
DOI:	10.5281/zenodo.3362203
Popis:	Проаналізовано погляди щодо розуміння державного підприємства. З’ясовано роль форми власності на віднесення підприємств до державних. Встановлено призначення державних підприємств – розв’язання завдань держави в процесі реалізації її функцій. Обґрунтовано співвідношення державних потреб, завдань держави її функцій. Виявлено перелік функції держави. З’ясовано сфери функціонування державних підприємств – стратегічні для життєдіяльності суспільства. Проаналізовано діяльність наявних державних підприємств в Україні. Виявлено неефективність існуючої системи державних підприємств в реалізації функцій держави. З’ясовано причини збитковості державних підприємств. Виявлено неналежність управління державним майном. Проаналізовано зарубіжний досвід функціонування державних підприємств. З’ясовано реформаційні заходи щодо управління державними підприємствами в Україні. Обґрунтовано шляхи підвищення ефективності участі державних підприємств України в реалізації функцій держави. The state-owned enterprises of Ukraine belong to the public sector of the economy and are the property and financial resource of the state, on which the realization of its functions depends. The purpose of the article is to clarify issues that mediate the involvement of state-owned enterprises in the implementation of state functions, in particular: the nature and purpose of state-owned enterprises; their ability to perform the functions of the state; experience of foreign states in the functioning of state-owned enterprises; formulating proposals to improve this process. Scientific results are obtained through the use of methodological tools. The dialectical approach has established that state-owned enterprises are entities based on state ownership, whose activities are aimed at solving the tasks of the state in various spheres of society in the process of realization of state functions. Within the framework of the synergistic approach, the purpose of state-owned enterprises is clarified - to solve the tasks of the state in various strategic spheres of its activity in the process of realization of its functions. Within the framework of the sociological methodology, the need for an approach establishes the correlation of the needs of the state, its tasks and functions, to which the activity of state-owned enterprises is directed. Techniques and legal forecasting were used, particularly in the process of problem identification. It is established that not all existing state-owned enterprises of Ukraine are capable of fulfilling the functions of the state, as a large part of them are unprofitable, which is a consequence of inefficient management of state property. It is substantiated that in order to increase the efficiency of participation of state-owned enterprises of Ukraine in the implementation of the functions of the state, appropriate reform measures should be taken, built on the problems identified and summarized by the monitoring programs, on a scientific basis, taking into account the forecast indicators. The existing legal framework that regulates the functioning of state-owned enterprises needs to be revised, and the accountability of the subjects of their management should be strengthened. {"references":["1. Kilʹkistʹ yurydychnykh osib za orhanizatsiyno-pravovymy formamy hospodaryuvannya [Number of legal enti-ties by organizational and legal forms of management]. Retrieved from: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/edrpoy/ukr/EDRPU_2019/ks_opfg/ks_opfg_0119.htm (in Ukr.).","2. Petryshyna, N. V. (2015). Derzhavni pidpryyemstva v Ukrayini: problemy funktsionuvannya ta shlyakhy yikh vyrishennya [State-owned enterprises in Ukraine: functioning problems and ways of solving them]. Naukovyy chasopys NPU imeni M.P. Drahomanova. Seriya 18: Ekonomika i pravo, (30). 73–79 (in Ukr.).","3. Motrychenko, V. M. (2010). Derzhavne pidpryyemstvo v systemi rynkovykh vidnosyn [State enterprise in the system of market relations]. Candidate's thesis (08.00.01). Kyiv (in Ukr.).","4. Kravchenko, M. O. (2015). Problemy i napryamy pidvyshchennya efektyvnosti diyalʹnosti pidpryyemstv derzhavnoho sektoru ekonomiky Ukrayiny [Problems and directions of increase of efficiency of activity of the enterprises of public sector of economy of Ukraine]. Ekonomichnyy visnyk Natsionalʹnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu Ukrayiny \"Kyyivsʹkyy politekhnichnyy instytut\", (12). 51–57 (in Ukr.).","5. Tarasyuk, H. M. (2014). Upravlinnya derzhavnymy pidpryyemstvamy: problemy ta perspektyvy [Manage-ment of state-owned enterprises: problems and prospects]. Visnyk ZHDTU. Seriya: Ekonomichni nauky, 4(70). 111–118 (in Ukr.).","6. The Current Situation and Problems of State-Owned Enterprises in Azerbaijan. K. Hashimova, Z. Kadyrov. CESD PRESS Baku, 2017. Retrieved from: http://cesd.az/new/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/State-Owned-Enterprises-Azerbaijan.pdf.","7. Chul Ju Kim. (2017). Efficient Management of State-Owned Enterprises: Challenges and Opportunities. ADBI Policy Brief, (4). 2–7.","8. Milhaupt, C. J., & Pargendler, M. (2017). Governance Challenges of Listed StateOwned Enterprises around the World: National Experiences and a Framework for Reform. Cornell International Law Journal, 50(3). Retrieved from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2942193.","9. Tymchenko, S. M., Bostan, S. K., & Lehusha, S. M. et al. (2007). Aktualʹni problemy teoriyi derzhavy ta prava [Topical problems of state theory and law]. Navch. posibnyk. Ch. 1. Kyiv: KNT (in Ukr.).","10. Hospodarsʹkyy kodeks Ukrayiny [Business Code of Ukraine]. Zakon Ukrayiny (16.01.2003). Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/436-15 (in Ukr.).","11. Matuzov, N. I., & Mal'ko, A. V. (2004). Teoriya gosudarstva i prava [Theory of State and Law]. Uchebnik. Moskva: Yurist\" (in Russ.).","12. Zaychuk, O. V., & Onishchenko, N. M. (Reds.). (2008). Teoriya derzhavy i prava. Akademichnyy kurs [The theory of state and law. Academic course]. Pidruchnyk. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter (in Ukr.).","13. Shcherbyna, V. I. (2006). Orhanizatsiya upravlinnya derzhavnymy pidpryyemstvamy: stan ta perspektyvy [Organization of management of state-owned enterprises: status and prospects]. Retrieved from: http://www.kdu.edu.ua/statti/2006-5-1%2840%29/135.pdf (in Ukr.).","14. Pikulya, T. O. (2010). Mekhanizm derzhavy: retrospektyvnyy ohlyad ta suchasni naukovi tendentsiyi vyznachennya [The mechanism of the state: a retrospective review and current scientific trends of determination]. Pravo i suspilʹstvo, (2). 9–15 (in Ukr.).","15. State Participation and State-Owned Enterprises Roles, Benefits and Challenges. 2015. Retrieved from: https://resourcegovernance.org/sites/default/files/nrgi_State-Participation-and-SOEs.pdf.","16. Kenton, W. (2019). State-Owned Enterprise (SOE). Retrieved from: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/soe.asp.","17. 4 key challenges for reforming state-owned enterprises: Lessons from Latin America. F. Weiner, C. Price Ivins, M. Riveira Cazorla. 2015. Retrieved from: https://blogs.worldbank.org/governance/4-key-challenges-reforming-state-owned-enterprises-lessons-latin-america.","18. Radygin, A., Simachev, Y., & Entov R. (2015). The state-owned company: \"State failure\" or \"market fail-ure\"? Russian Journal of Economics, 55–80.","19. Yezhelʹ, O. L. (2013). Tlumachennya ponyattya derzhavnykh potreb u sferi derzhavnoho zamovlennya [Interpretation of the concept of state needs in the field of public procurement]. Naukovyy visnyk Mizhnarodnoho humanitranoho universytetu. Ser.: Yurysprudentsiya, 6–1(2). 17–19 (in Ukr.).","20. Melʹnychuk, S. M. (2018). Pravovi formy realizatsiyi funktsiy suchasnoyi derzhavy Ukrayina: zahalʹnoteoretychna kharakterystyka [Legal Forms of Implementation of Functions of the Modern State of Ukraine: General Theoretical Characteristics]. Monohrafiya. Ivano-Frankivsʹk: Vydavetsʹ: Kushnir H. M. (in Ukr.).","21. Konstytutsiya Ukrayiny [Constitution of Ukraine]. Zakon Ukrayiny (28.06.1996 No 254k/96-vr). Retrieved from: http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show (in Ukr.).","22. Melʹnychuk, S. M. (2014). Funktsiyi suchasnoyi derzhavy: problemy klasyfikatsiyi [Functions of the modern state: problems of classification]. Osoblyvosti formuvannya zakonodavstva Ukrayiny: filosofsʹko-pravovi, istorychni ta prykladni aspekty: materialy Vseukrayinsʹkoyi naukovo-praktychnoyi konferentsiyi (m. Ivano-Frankivsʹk, 6 bereznya 2014 r.). Ivano-Frankivsʹk (s. 91–94) (in Ukr.).","23. Pro Kabinet Ministriv Ukrayiny [About the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine]. Zakon Ukrayiny (27.02.2014 No 794–7). Vidomosti Verkhovnoyi Rady Ukrayiny, (13). 222 (in Ukr.).","24. Top-100 derzhavnykh pidpryyemstv u 2018 rotsi otrymaly zahalʹnyy prybutok v 25,3 mlrd hrn. [The top 100 state-owned enterprises in 2018 received total profit of UAH 25.3 billion]. 2019. Retrieved from: http://www.me.gov.ua/News/Detail?lang=uk-UA&id=5b766e9d-5da7-411a-9037-7085c5da1bca&title=Top100-DerzhavnikhPidprimstvU2018-RotsiOtrimaliZagalniiPributokV25-3-MlrdGrn (in Ukr.).","25. Administratsiya morsʹkykh portiv Ukrayiny [Administration of seaports of Ukraine]. Retrieved from: http://www.uspa.gov.ua (in Ukr.).","26. M. le Cordeur. Unprofitable SOEs have become a 'substantial' risk on fiscus. 2017. Retrieved from: https://www.fin24.com/Budget/Budget-and-Economy/unprofitable-soes-have-become-a-substantial-risk-on-fiscus-20171025.","27. Frykberg, M. (2018). Tanzania to shut down loss-making state-owned enterprises. Retrieved from: https://www.iol.co.za/business-report/international/tanzania-to-shut-down-loss-making-state-owned-enterprises-15976574.","28. Ali Al-Mawlawi. Iraq's. State-Owned Enterprises: A Case Study for Public Spending Reform. 2018. Retrieved from: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/crp/2018/10/18/iraqs-state-owned-enterprises.","29. Zvit Rakhunkovoyi palaty za 2018 rik [Accounting Chamber report for 2018]. Kyiv, 2019. Retrieved from: https://rp.gov.ua/upload-files/Activity/Reports/2018/ZVIT_RP_2018.pdf (in Ukr.).","30. Minekonomrozvytku rozrobylo polityku vlasnosti u derzhavnomu sektori ekonomiky [The Ministry of Eco-nomic Development has developed a policy of ownership in the public sector of the economy]. Retrieved from: https://www.kmu.gov.ua/ua/news/minekonomrozvitku-rozrobilo-politiku-vlasnosti-u-derzhavnomu-sektori-ekonomiki (in Ukr.).","31. State-Owned Enterprise Reform in Latin America: Issues and Possible Solutions. Aldo Musacchio Emilio I. Pineda Ayerbe Gustavo García. 2015. Inter-American Development Bank. 51 p."]}
Databáze:	OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz:	https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::3b25521c08e384f367dec7fc515276b3 Zobrazit plný text záznamu