Abstract 269: Bedside Monitoring of Peripheral Blood Perfusion Using Pulse Oximetry Sensor and its Reliability and Clinical Usefulness Compared With Traditional Capillary Refill Measurement
Autor: | Timmy Li, Lance B Becker, Koichiro Shinozaki, Julianne M. Falotico, Lee S. Jacobson, Kota Saeki |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2018 |
Předmět: |
genetic structures
medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Hemodynamics Capillary refill Peripheral blood Pulse oximetry Physiology (medical) Shock (circulatory) Medicine cardiovascular diseases medicine.symptom Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine business Perfusion Reliability (statistics) circulatory and respiratory physiology Biomedical engineering |
Zdroj: | Circulation. 138 |
ISSN: | 1524-4539 0009-7322 |
Popis: | Objective: The traditional capillary refill time (CRT) assessment is a manual measurement that is commonly used by clinicians to identify a shock status. Given that the measurement is manual only, it is a relatively subjective measurement. Our study tested an investigational CRT device, comprised of existing pulse oximeter technology paired with a novel measuring algorithm, at an emergency department (ED) setting to determine its reliability and clinical usefulness compared with the traditional, manual CRT assessment. Methods: Three healthcare providers (registered nurses or physician assistants) were selected to perform manual CRT assessments at the bedside to classify patients into either a normal (≤2 seconds) or abnormal (>2 seconds) CRT groups. An attending ED physician, blinded from the healthcare providers’ classifications, quantitatively measured CRT using a chronograph (visual CRT). The pulse oximeter sensor was attached to the same hand used for visual CRT assessments but on a different fingertip. Visual and device CRTs were measured alternately and were repeated three times for each method. Device CRT data from 30 healthy volunteers in a previous study was used as a reference. Results: Thirty ED patients were recruited. Mean device CRT of ED patients (3.9±2.7 sec) was significantly longer than those of healthy volunteers (2.0±1.0 sec, p Conclusions: CRT assessments by healthcare providers were variable compared with those of the ED physician. Device CRT was as reliable and useful as the CRT measured quantitatively by the ED physician. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |