COMPARISON OF REVISION ‘THRESHOLDS’ USING PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES FOLLOWING TOTAL AND UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY
| Autor: | M.L. Tay, A.P. Monk, C.M. Frampton, G.J. Hooper, S.W. Young |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2023 |
| Zdroj: | Orthopaedic Proceedings. :14-14 |
| ISSN: | 2049-4416 1358-992X |
| Popis: | Source of the study: University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand and University of Otago, Christchurch, New ZealandPatient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are predictors of knee arthroplasty revision. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is effective for patients with the correct indications, however has higher revision rates than total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Different revision thresholds for the procedures have been postulated. Our aims were to investigate: 1) if PROMs could predict knee arthroplasty revision within two years of the score at six months, five years and ten years follow-up, and 2) if revision ‘thresholds’ differed between TKA and UKA.All TKAs and UKAs captured by the New Zealand Joint Registry between 1999 and 2019 with at least one OKS response at six months (TKA n=27,708, UKA n=8,415), five years (TKA n=11,519, UKA n=3,365) or ten years (TKA n=6,311, UKA n=1,744) were included. were propensity-score matched 2:1 with UKAs for comparison of revision thresholds.Logistic regression indicated that for every one-unit decrease in OKS, the odds of TKA and UKA revision decreased by 10% and 11% at six months, 10% and 12% at five years and 9% and 5% at ten years. Fewer TKA patients with ‘poor’ outcomes (≤25) subsequently underwent revision compared with UKA at six months (5.1% vs. 19.6%, pThe OKS is a strong predictor of subsequent knee arthroplasty revision within two years of the score from early to late term. A lower revision threshold was found with UKA when compared with a matched TKA cohort. Higher revision rates of UKA are associated with both lower clinical thresholds for revision and additional modes of UKA failure. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|