The relationship of polarity of post-publication peer review to citation count
| Autor: | Lili Fan, Qianjin Zong, Jingshi Huang, Yafen Xie |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Polarity (physics)
05 social sciences Confounding Negative binomial distribution Library and Information Sciences 050905 science studies Computer Science Applications Page count Citation analysis Statistics Altmetrics 0509 other social sciences 050904 information & library sciences Psychology Citation Information Systems |
| Zdroj: | Online Information Review. 44:583-602 |
| ISSN: | 1468-4527 |
| DOI: | 10.1108/oir-01-2019-0027 |
| Popis: | PurposeThe purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship of the post-publication peer review (PPPR) polarity of a paper to that paper's citation count.Design/methodology/approachPapers with PPPRs from Publons.com as the experimental groups were manually matched 1:2 with the related papers without PPPR as the control group, by the same journal, the same issue (volume), the same access status (gold open access or not) and the same document type. None of the papers in the experimental group or control group received any comments or recommendations from ResearchGate, PubPeer or F1000. The polarity of the PPPRs was coded by using content analysis. A negative binomial regression analysis was conducted to examine the data by controlling the characteristics of papers.FindingsThe four experimental groups and their corresponding control groups were generated as follows: papers with neutral PPPRs, papers with both negative and positive PPPRs, papers with negative PPPRs and papers with positive PPPRs as well as four corresponding control groups (papers without PPPRs). The results are as follows: while holding the other variables (such as page count, number of authors, etc.) constant in the model, papers that received neutral PPPRs, those that received negative PPPRs and those that received both negative and positive PPPRs had no significant differences in citation count when compared to their corresponding control pairs (papers without PPPRs). Papers that received positive PPPRs had significantly greater citation count than their corresponding control pairs (papers without PPPRs) while holding the other variables (such as page count, number of authors, etc.) constant in the model.Originality/valueBased on a broader range of PPPR sentiments, by controlling many of the confounding factors (including the characteristics of the papers and the effects of the other PPPR platforms), this study analyzed the relationship of various polarities of PPPRs to citation count. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|