Effect of audit report disclosure on auditor litigation risk
| Autor: | Steven Mong, Peter Roebuck |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2005 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Accounting and Finance. 45:145-169 |
| ISSN: | 1467-629X 0810-5391 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/j.1467-629x.2004.00124.x |
| Popis: | Internationally, the escalating number of cases levelled against auditors and the costs of defending such actions has led to the auditing profession calling for measures to reduce their liability burden. Relatively few measures have been taken by the auditing profession by way of adapting the disclosure contained in the audit report to mitigate their litigation risk. This study examines whether the issuance of an audit opinion with a going concern related ‘emphasis of matter’ paragraph or work practices disclosure has any effect on potential litigants' likelihood of pursuing litigation against the auditor. An analysis of 69 responses from advanced law students and 18 practitioners working in corporate liquidation demonstrate that a modified (but not qualified) audit report effectively acts as a ‘red flag’ and reduces potential litigants' propensity to initiate litigation. However, work practices disclosure did not significantly alter potential litigants' inclination to recommend litigation. Despite this finding, respondents (particularly liquidators) indicated that work practices disclosure was an important factor in their litigation decision. These results suggest that further investigation into how to effectively disclose the work done on audit and assurance engagements is needed. This has implications for standard setters and the auditing profession, especially considering recent changes in the disclosure contained in audit and assurance reports. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|