Pairwise judgments consistency impact on quality of multi-criteria group decision-making with AHP[S1]
| Autor: | Pawel Tadeusz Kazibudzki, Jiří Křupka |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: |
Decision support system
Theoretical computer science Hierarchy (mathematics) Computer science Strategy and Management media_common.quotation_subject 05 social sciences Analytic hierarchy process Group decision-making Consistency (negotiation) 0502 economics and business 050211 marketing Quality (business) Pairwise comparison Business and International Management Set (psychology) General Economics Econometrics and Finance 050203 business & management media_common |
| Zdroj: | E+M Ekonomie a Management. 22:195-212 |
| ISSN: | 1212-3609 |
| DOI: | 10.15240/tul/001/2019-4-013 |
| Popis: | Presumably complex systems can be better understood when they are broken down into their constituent elements and structured hierarchically. Then, judgments about these elements can be synthesized on the basis of their relative importance at each level of the hierarchy into a set of overall priorities. By breaking down a reality into homogenous clusters and subdividing them into smaller ones, it is possible to integrate large amounts of information into the structure of a problem and form a more comprehensive picture of the whole system. There is a decision support methodology (DSM) which conforms to the above prescription. It is called the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and was devised at the Wharton School of Business by Thomas Saaty (1980). Its contemporary applications can be found, for example in Lidinska and Jablonsky (2018), Abdelmaguid and Elrashidy (2016), Kramulova and Jablonský (2016), and Ponis et al. (2015). |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|